An 81-year-old Florida man accused of fatally shooting his boss stepped outside afterward to smoke a cigarette, then rode a tricycle around the parking lot of the business until police arrived, according to an arrest affidavit.

Jose Antonio Lopez was arrested after the October 14 shooting of Delio Trasobares, 61, who owned Metro Express in Medley, Florida. The confrontation began when Trasobares discovered Lopez was still sleeping at the business despite being told weeks earlier that he could no longer do so without permission.

When Medley police arrived shortly after 7:30 a.m., they found Lopez riding the tricycle outside. As an officer approached, Lopez volunteered, "I did it," before telling police that a gun was beside a microwave inside the building.

Trasobares was airlifted to a Miami hospital, where he died from his injuries. Lopez later admitted shooting his employer because he had grown tired of the man's insults and complaints. He faces a charge of second-degree murder.

Another Morning at the Repair Shop

Trasobares arrived at Metro Express at approximately 7:28 a.m. and found Lopez and another employee sitting in chairs inside a structure used as a repair shop. The owner had learned several weeks earlier that Lopez was sleeping on the premises without his permission and instructed him not to do so again.

Finding that Lopez had continued sleeping there, Trasobares ordered him to leave. Lopez got out of his chair without arguing, walked approximately three feet to a shelf, and retrieved a .40-caliber handgun. He turned toward his employer, cursed at him in Spanish, and fired, striking him in the chest, according to the Medley Police Department affidavit.

Trasobares attempted to walk away but collapsed at the entrance to the repair shop. As the other employee called 911, Lopez walked outside to smoke a cigarette and subsequently began riding a tricycle around the parking lot.

Waiting for the Police

Officers were dispatched to Metro Express at approximately 7:31 a.m. after receiving a report of a shooting and a description of the suspect. They found Lopez still riding the tricycle, and his unsolicited admission came as an officer approached him.

After taking him into custody, police asked whether he was carrying any weapons. Lopez directed them to the gun beside the microwave. A subsequent search of the property yielded two firearms, a 9 mm and a .40 caliber, along with a spent cartridge casing and a projectile.

Miami-Dade Fire Rescue airlifted Trasobares to Ryder Trauma Center at Jackson Memorial Hospital, where he was pronounced dead despite efforts to save his life.

What He Told Detectives

Lopez complained of chest pains after his arrest and was transported to Palmetto Hospital, where he was admitted for high blood pressure. Following his discharge on October 15, he was taken to the Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office Homicide Bureau, advised of his rights, and interviewed by detectives.

During questioning, Lopez admitted shooting Trasobares after being instructed to leave the premises. He said he was "fed up" and "had enough" of his employer insulting him and complaining.

Lopez was charged with second-degree murder and booked into the Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center. He was denied bond during his initial court appearance, which he attended remotely from his hospital bed, according to WPLG Local 10.

Enjoy Florida Man and Florida Woman stories? Follow Guessing Headlights on Facebook for more bizarre Florida arrests, unbelievable police reports, exclusive updates, and stories that don't make it into our regular coverage.

All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Some of Ferrari's most fascinating creations aren't necessarily the ones that won famous races. Occasionally, it's the cars that never reached the starting line that have the most interesting stories to tell.

Take this extraordinary 1955 Ferrari 250 Europa GT Speciale, a one-off creation with distinctive rear fins and a remarkable history. Built for French gentleman racer André Dubonnet, it was originally intended to compete in the 1956 24 Hours of Le Mans.

Unfortunately, an injury prevented Dubonnet from entering the race, leaving the Ferrari's competition potential unexplored. Instead, the car embarked on an unusual journey involving multiple owners, extensive modifications, and a painstaking restoration.

Now, chassis 0393GT is preparing to cross the auction block at Mecum's Kissimmee sale on January 16, 2027. Its rarity, distinctive styling, and fascinating backstory make it one of the event's most intriguing offerings.

A Ferrari Unlike Any Other

Only 34 Ferrari 250 Europa GTs were built, and just four received special Pinin Farina-designed berlinetta bodywork. Of those four, this example was the only one factory-equipped with exaggerated rear fins.

Dubonnet collaborated with Ferrari and Pinin Farina to create an aluminum-bodied grand tourer suitable for endurance racing. The finished car debuted at the 1955 Paris Auto Salon, featuring a fastback roofline, distinctive side vents, and numerous bespoke details.

Its racing-inspired equipment included an oversized fuel tank, quick-fill fuel opening, and a folding passenger seat that provided access to the spare tire. The lightweight aluminum bodywork was another deliberate choice for competition.

A Colombo V12 With Racing Ambitions

Under the hood sits a 3.0-liter Colombo V12 producing approximately 220 horsepower, paired with a four-speed manual transmission. The engine features three Weber carburetors and a higher-lift camshaft than the standard unit.

The car also rides on a tubular chassis with independent front suspension, a solid rear axle, and four-wheel hydraulic drum brakes. Its mechanical layout reflects Ferrari's early approach to building road cars with serious racing potential.

From Forgotten Ferrari To Concours Star

After Dubonnet sold the car, it eventually passed into American hands and underwent substantial changes. Its signature rear fins were removed, a hood scoop was added, and the body was repainted bright red.

A later owner even painted it military gray to facilitate its shipment to the United States. Eventually, the Ferrari underwent a decade-long restoration that recreated its distinctive fins.

Following another restoration, it now wears its original dark blue and tan color combination. Ferrari Classiche certified the car in 2022, and it has appeared at prestigious events including Pebble Beach.

A Rare Opportunity For Ferrari Collectors

Mecum hasn't provided a public estimate in the supplied listing, so its potential selling price is unknown. However, its unique coachwork, documented history, and Ferrari Classiche certification should make it an interesting proposition for serious collectors.

Although it never competed at Le Mans, this 1955 Europa GT Speciale is still a remarkable piece of Ferrari history that stands out from the crowd thanks to those unmistakable rear fins.

Mercedes-AMG has unveiled an electric SUV with enough power to embarrass some of the world's fastest supercars. Called the AMG GT SUV, the newcomer combines extraordinary performance figures with the space and practicality expected from a luxury family vehicle.

The headline-grabbing version is the GT63, which produces up to 1,153 horsepower and can reportedly accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in just 2.4 seconds. Those are extraordinary numbers for a vehicle weighing approximately 5,700 pounds.

Unveiled in Stuttgart, the GT SUV follows the electric AMG GT 4-Door Coupe introduced earlier this year. Both vehicles share Mercedes-AMG's dedicated AMG.EA architecture, although the SUV offers additional interior space and larger battery options.

Interestingly, this is also the first SUV developed entirely by Mercedes-AMG rather than adapted from an existing Mercedes-Benz platform. The result is a vehicle designed around high performance from the outset.

Three Versions, With Up To 1,153 Horsepower

The lineup includes GT53, GT55, and GT63 variants, each offering a different level of performance. The entry-level GT53 uses two electric motors producing a total of 536 horsepower, while the GT55 increases output to 805 horsepower.

The flagship GT63 features three axial-flux electric motors, with one powering the front axle and two driving the rear wheels. Together, they deliver a peak output of 1,153 horsepower and 1,475 lb-ft of torque.

The GT55 and GT63 also feature a sophisticated cooling system designed to sustain demanding performance driving. Mercedes-AMG quotes up to 711 horsepower of sustained output, distinguishing it from the much higher short-duration peak figures.

Big Batteries And Clever Suspension

The GT55 and GT63 use a 128-kWh battery, with a claimed WLTP driving range of up to 434 miles. The GT53 gets a smaller 106-kWh pack, with a quoted range of up to 363 miles.

Mercedes also claims DC fast-charging capability of up to 710 kW for the larger battery and 600 kW for the smaller one. Actual charging performance will depend on suitable infrastructure and operating conditions.

Meanwhile, AMG Active Ride Control+ uses adjustable air suspension and hydraulic systems to counteract body roll and pitch. The technology is intended to keep the heavy SUV stable during hard acceleration, braking, and cornering.

A Practical SUV With An AMG Personality

Inside, the GT SUV features a driver-oriented digital dashboard, Mercedes' MB.OS infotainment system, and a spacious rear seating area. Available reclining rear seats add a welcome touch of comfort.

For those missing the sound of combustion engines, AMG has also included simulated engine sounds and gear changes, a feature that's likely to divide opinion among driving enthusiasts.

U.S. pricing hasn't been announced, although the GT SUV is expected to arrive stateside in 2027. With its remarkable performance figures, it promises to be one of the most extreme electric family vehicles Mercedes has ever produced.

When enthusiasts think of classic Oldsmobiles, models like the 442, Toronado, and 88 usually come to mind. However, the American automaker produced plenty of interesting cars long before those nameplates became household names.

One of them was the Series 60, an entry-level Oldsmobile introduced in 1939 and discontinued after the 1948 model year. These days, finding a beautifully restored example isn't exactly an everyday occurrence.

Fortunately, this 1948 Oldsmobile Series 60 has survived the decades in impressive fashion. Finished in an attractive two-tone green paint scheme, the vintage American sedan looks ready to transport its next owner back to the postwar era.

The car is scheduled to cross the block at Mecum's Dallas/Fort Worth auction on October 22, 2026. With its extensive restoration and period-correct appearance, it should attract interest from collectors who appreciate overlooked American classics.

A Beautiful Reminder Of Oldsmobile's Early Years

According to Mecum, the car has undergone a comprehensive restoration, including refreshed chrome, period-correct trim, and factory-style detailing. Its two-tone exterior combines Seafoam Green bodywork with a darker Ivy Green roof.

The result is an elegant appearance that suits the Oldsmobile's flowing fenders and generous chrome accents. Its understated styling is a refreshing contrast to the increasingly extravagant American cars that followed in the 1950s.

Inside, the cabin features a tan interior with two-tone upholstery and woodgrain dashboard detailing. The restoration clearly focused on preserving the car's original character rather than introducing modern custom touches.

Straight-Eight Power And An Automatic Gearbox

Under the hood sits a 257-cubic-inch (4.2-liter) inline-eight engine, rated at approximately 110 horsepower when new. While hardly impressive by modern standards, the straight-eight was well suited to relaxed cruising.

Power is delivered through a Hydra-Matic automatic transmission, a noteworthy feature for a car built in 1948. Oldsmobile had helped pioneer mass-produced fully automatic transmissions earlier that decade.

The eight-cylinder Series 60 was marketed as the Dynamic 68, distinguishing it from six-cylinder versions. The 1948 model year also marked the end of the Series 60's production run.

An Overlooked Classic Looking For Its Next Owner

With the auction scheduled for October 22, it will be interesting to see how much collectors are willing to pay for this restored Oldsmobile. Its restored condition and distinctive color combination could make it appealing to collectors seeking something different.

Although it lacks the fame of Oldsmobile's later muscle cars, this Series 60 represents an interesting chapter in the company's history. Hopefully, its next owner will appreciate the opportunity to keep this handsome piece of postwar American motoring on the road.

The Porsche 911 GT3 RS has earned a reputation as one of the most exciting road-legal performance cars ever built. However, when it comes to collector values, outright speed doesn't always determine which version enthusiasts want most.

In a recent episode of Jay Leno's Garage, the comedian and car collector welcomed automotive historian Donald Osborne to compare three generations of the track-focused Porsche. Their goal was to determine how the cars have evolved and why some are worth way more than others.

The lineup included a 2008 GT3 RS (997.1), a 2011 GT3 RS (997.2), and a 2016 GT3 RS (991.1). All three were supplied by the Audrain Automobile Museum in Newport, Rhode Island.

Although each represents a different stage in Porsche's pursuit of performance, Leno quickly identified a favorite. Interestingly, his choice wasn't the newest or most powerful of the three.

Three Generations, Three Different Personalities

The 2008 GT3 RS features a naturally aspirated 3.6-liter flat-six producing 415 horsepower, paired with a six-speed manual transmission. Its lightweight construction and track-focused suspension helped establish the formula that subsequent generations would refine.

For 2011, Porsche increased displacement to 3.8 liters and output to 450 horsepower. The updated 997.2 also benefited from aerodynamic improvements, including a more sophisticated adjustable rear wing.

The 2016 GT3 RS took another step forward with a 4.0-liter flat-six producing 500 horsepower. Unlike its predecessors, however, it used Porsche's seven-speed PDK dual-clutch transmission instead of a traditional manual.

Why The 2011 GT3 RS Is Worth The Most

Despite being less powerful than the 2016 model, the 2011 GT3 RS was Leno's clear favorite. Its combination of a six-speed manual and the celebrated Mezger-derived engine made it especially desirable, as the 997.2 marked the end of that engine lineage in the GT3 RS.

Osborne estimated that the 2011 car's market value had climbed from approximately $165,000 five years ago to around $450,000 today. That's a substantial increase, especially compared with the newer 2016 model.

The 2008 GT3 RS had also appreciated significantly, rising from an estimated $165,000 to $395,000. Meanwhile, the 2016 model increased from approximately $185,000 to $235,000, making it the least valuable of the three in Osborne's comparison.

The Fastest Porsche Isn't Necessarily The Favorite

Leno and Osborne agreed that the 2016 GT3 RS would likely be the quickest around a racetrack. Its additional power, improved aerodynamics, and rapid-shifting PDK gearbox give it a clear technological advantage.

Yet Leno preferred the older 2011 model for its manual transmission and distinctive engine character. For him, the connection between driver and machine mattered more than shaving a few seconds off a lap time.

The discussion also raised an important point about collecting cars designed for the racetrack. Regardless of their growing values, Leno and Osborne agree that these GT3 RS models deserve to be driven, not simply preserved as investments.

With its aggressive proportions, big-block V8 power, and unmistakable graphics, the Dodge Super Bee was never designed to blend into traffic.

This 1970 Dodge Coronet Super Bee, currently offered for sale through Hemmings, is a perfect example of that flamboyant era. Finished in eye-catching Bright Red with a contrasting white vinyl roof, it's ready to turn heads wherever it goes.

The classic Mopar is being sold by Fast Lane Classic Cars in St. Charles, Missouri, with an asking price of $79,995. For anyone hunting for an old-school American muscle car, there's plenty here to get excited about.

One detail worth approaching cautiously is the odometer, which displays just 3,639 miles. Given the car's age and five-digit odometer, that reading shouldn't be mistaken for verified lifetime mileage.

Red Paint, White Stripes, And Plenty Of Attitude

The Super Bee's striking exterior features distinctive white reverse-C stripes wrapping around the rear quarters, complete with the model's signature bee graphics. A white vinyl roof provides another bold contrast against the bright red bodywork.

Fifteen-inch American Racing Torque Thrust wheels wrapped in staggered Mickey Thompson Sportsman S/T tires give the Dodge a classic street-machine appearance. Chrome accents and the unmistakable 1970 Coronet front end complete the look.

Inside, white vinyl split-bench seating contrasts with a woodgrain dashboard and Rallye instrumentation, and there's a factory-style AM radio and Super Bee floor mats that add to the cabin's nostalgic atmosphere.

A Big-Block V8 With Three Carburetors

Under the hood sits a 383-cubic-inch (6.3-liter) V8 equipped with a Six-Pack induction conversion. Its three two-barrel carburetors give the engine the appearance and character of Mopar's legendary multi-carburetor setups.

Power reaches the rear wheels through an A727 TorqueFlite three-speed automatic transmission and an 8¾-inch rear axle. A 3.23:1 Sure Grip limited-slip differential helps put the V8's power to the pavement.

Power steering and power-assisted front disc brakes make the Dodge easier to handle, while dual exhaust provides the soundtrack you'd expect from a classic big-block Mopar.

A $79,995 Piece Of Mopar History

At $79,995, this Super Bee isn't cheap, although its presentation and desirable specifications should attract attention from Dodge enthusiasts. It should be noted that the Six-Pack setup is a conversion rather than an original factory-installed configuration.

Prospective buyers should also verify the car's history, mechanical condition, and actual mileage before committing. Hemmings notes that the listing information comes from the seller and hasn't been independently verified.

Still, it's hard not to appreciate a bright red Super Bee with a big-block V8 and such a wonderfully unapologetic appearance. Hopefully, its next owner will spend some time enjoying it on the road rather than simply admiring it in a garage.

Most people buying a brand-new Ford F-150 Raptor R would probably spend some time enjoying its factory performance before considering modifications. After all, a supercharged V8 producing 720 horsepower is hardly lacking in muscle.

One owner, however, had other plans for his 2026 Raptor R. Rather than taking delivery and driving it home, he arranged for the dealership to send the truck straight to Texas-based tuning specialist Late Model Racecraft (LMR).

The pickup had just 30 miles on its odometer when it arrived at the workshop. Its owner wanted a substantial increase in power without sacrificing the everyday drivability that makes the Raptor R surprisingly usable.

LMR answered with its 1,000-horsepower performance package, transforming the already ridiculous pickup into something even wilder. The results were documented in a video on the company's YouTube channel, complete with dyno figures and a demonstration of its newfound performance.

From 720 To 1,000 Horsepower

The Raptor R's factory 5.2-liter supercharged V8 produces 720 horsepower and 640 lb-ft of torque. Before making any modifications, LMR measured 547 horsepower at the rear wheels on its dynamometer.

The biggest upgrade involved replacing the factory 2.65-liter supercharger with a much larger 3.8-liter Whipple twin-screw unit. The team also installed a 132mm throttle body and an upgraded S&B cold-air intake to help the engine breathe.

Cooling received attention as well, with an additional intercooler pump installed to help control intake temperatures. Interestingly, the truck kept its factory exhaust manifolds, catalytic converters, and exhaust system.

An Extra 250 Horsepower At The Wheels

Following the upgrades, the Raptor R produced 797 horsepower at the rear wheels, a gain of 250 horsepower over its original dyno result of 547. LMR estimates the modified engine produces approximately 1,000 horsepower at the crankshaft.

The tuning company also emphasized that the setup was designed to run on premium pump gasoline rather than specialized racing fuel. Its goal was to deliver much stronger acceleration while maintaining factory-like road manners.

Plenty Of Power To Roast The Tires

During the road demonstration, the modified Raptor R launched with impressive traction in its automatic four-wheel-drive setting. Switching to two-wheel drive told a different story, with the truck easily spinning its rear tires under acceleration.

Despite the dramatic power increase, the pickup still has its original exhaust note, accompanied by a noticeably louder supercharger whine. That combination should appeal to owners who prefer a relatively understated appearance and sound.

LMR hasn't disclosed the price of the conversion, and such extensive engine modifications could affect factory warranty coverage. With 1,000 horsepower on tap, this Raptor R should have no trouble reminding its owner why 720 horsepower apparently wasn't enough in the first place.

Finding a classic American pickup that hasn't been heavily modified, restored, or driven into the ground is becoming increasingly difficult. Fortunately, this 1976 Chevrolet K10 Scottsdale appears to have escaped all three fates.

Finished in a beautiful combination of Hawaiian Blue and beige, this square-body Chevy looks like it could have rolled straight out of a dealership in the 1970s. Its old-school charm is backed up by an equally impressive ownership history.

According to its Bring a Trailer listing, the truck has belonged to the same owner since it was purchased new in Colorado nearly 50 years ago. Its odometer currently displays just 37,000 miles, although the listing doesn't independently verify the total mileage.

Now being offered on behalf of the owner's estate, the K10 is looking for its second caretaker. Anyone interested in preserving a remarkably original piece of Chevrolet truck history has an opportunity to do exactly that.

A Classic Square-Body With Plenty Of Character

The truck's two-tone paintwork is complemented by chrome bumpers, 15-inch steel wheels, and a matching toolbox mounted in its Fleetside bed. There's no oversized lift kit or flashy aftermarket bodywork to distract from the original design.

Inside, the cabin is equally simple, featuring a blue cloth bench seat, simulated woodgrain trim, and a traditional AM radio, serving as a reminder of an era when pickup interiors prioritized simplicity over giant touchscreens.

V8 Power And A Proper Four-Speed Manual

Under the hood sits Chevrolet's familiar 350-cubic-inch (5.7-liter) V8, paired with a four-speed manual transmission. Power is delivered through a dual-range transfer case, giving the K10 genuine four-wheel-drive capability.

Manually locking front hubs, power steering, front disc brakes, and rear drum brakes complete the mechanical package. The truck also features dual fuel tanks and a receiver hitch, reflecting its original purpose as a practical working vehicle.

A Rare Survivor Looking For Its Next Owner

The truck comes with service records, spare parts, and a clean Colorado title in the original owner's name. Detailed photographs also document its condition, including visible imperfections accumulated over the decades.

At the time of writing, bidding had reached $12,000, with the auction scheduled to end on October 21, 2026. The final selling price will depend on how much someone is willing to pay for its originality and ownership history.

After spending almost half a century with one owner, this Chevy deserves someone who appreciates its unmodified character. Hopefully, its next owner will resist the temptation to turn it into another lifted, big-wheeled, LS-powered restomod.

Modern pickup trucks come packed with advanced suspension systems, electronic driving aids, and specialized off-road equipment. However, a nearly century-old Ford has just demonstrated that tackling uneven terrain doesn't always require the latest technology.

At the 2026 Oklahoma State Fair, Ram set up an obstacle course to showcase the capabilities of its modern pickups. The demonstration took an unexpected turn when a 1928 Ford Model A sedan was allowed to tackle the same obstacles.

Footage shared on YouTube by Davis Auto Ranch shows the vintage Ford making its way across the course without any obvious difficulty. Despite its age and modest mechanical specifications, the classic sedan handles the uneven ground surprisingly well.

The Model A appears to be largely stock, rather than a modified off-road build wearing vintage bodywork, making its performance all the more impressive.

An Old Ford Shows Off Its Suspension

The short course features several raised dirt obstacles designed to demonstrate suspension articulation and ground clearance. As the Model A crosses them, its suspension flexes noticeably while the narrow tires maintain contact with the ground.

There are no sophisticated traction-control systems or selectable driving modes involved. The Ford simply crawls over the obstacles using mechanical hardware developed nearly 100 years ago.

Built When Smooth Roads Were A Luxury

The Model A's performance makes sense when considering the conditions it was designed to handle. When Ford introduced the car in 1927, many American roads were still unpaved, and everyday driving frequently involved rough surfaces.

Its relatively generous ground clearance, narrow tires, and simple suspension helped it cope with those conditions. Although this example is a sedan, Ford also produced commercial vehicles based on the Model A platform.

Not Exactly A Tough Off-Road Challenge

To be fair, Ram's temporary demonstration course wasn't intended to test the limits of modern four-wheel-drive trucks. Its relatively gentle obstacles provide an accessible way for visitors to experience suspension movement and uneven terrain.

A modern Ram would have substantial advantages over the Model A on demanding trails, particularly where traction, power, and advanced off-road technology become important. The video doesn't establish that the vintage Ford could match a modern pickup in genuinely difficult conditions.

Nevertheless, watching a 98-year-old sedan navigate a course designed for contemporary trucks is undeniably entertaining. It also serves as a reminder that early automobiles were built to handle roads far rougher than the smooth pavement most drivers encounter today.

The Chevrolet Corvette has undergone some major changes over the years, but few have divided enthusiasts quite like the disappearance of the manual transmission. When the C8 introduced its mid-engine layout, it also abandoned the traditional clutch pedal in favor of an eight-speed dual-clutch automatic.

For drivers who enjoy rowing their own gears, that decision was disappointing. With several exotic manufacturers showing renewed interest in manual transmissions, some enthusiasts have wondered whether Chevrolet might eventually reconsider.

Rumors about a manual-equipped next-generation C9 Corvette have only added to that speculation. Unfortunately, comments from one of General Motors' top performance engineers suggest those hopes are unlikely to become reality.

Tony Roma, GM's executive chief engineer for Corvette and performance cars, recently addressed the subject during an appearance on The Drivecast. His explanation comes down to a familiar obstacle in automotive engineering: money.

A Manual Corvette Would Be Too Expensive To Develop

According to Roma, previous Corvette generations benefited from an established manual transmission design that GM could continue refining. The C5, C6, and C7 used related transmission architectures, allowing Chevrolet to spread development costs across decades.

The mid-engined C8 presents a different challenge because of its transaxle packaging. Introducing a manual would require substantial new engineering work, making the investment difficult to justify for a relatively small group of buyers.

Roma acknowledged that he personally enjoys manual transmissions, but enthusiasm alone isn't enough to make the business case work.

What About Tremec's Six-Speed Manual?

There was a glimmer of hope when transmission manufacturer Tremec unveiled a six-speed manual transaxle at SEMA in 2025. The company suggested its design could fit the C8 Corvette, raising hopes that a manual conversion might be possible.

Roma initially questioned how production-ready the transmission really was, although Tremec disputed his assessment. He has since clarified that even if the gearbox could physically work, it hadn't undergone the full validation and certification required for a GM production vehicle.

Nearly a year after its unveiling, a functioning Corvette prototype equipped with the transmission has yet to appear publicly.

GM Isn't Chasing The Manual Supercar Trend

Manual transmissions have recently gained renewed appeal among buyers of exclusive performance cars. Roma believes some of that demand comes from their increasing rarity rather than any inherent performance advantage.

For Chevrolet, the Corvette's dual-clutch transmission offers compelling performance and usability benefits. Roma summarized his philosophy simply: "You don't do it just because you can. You do it because it makes the car better."

That doesn't amount to an official confirmation about the C9's transmission options. However, it suggests enthusiasts hoping for the return of a three-pedal Corvette shouldn't get too excited.

Tesla's long-awaited second-generation Roadster has finally made an appearance, promising extraordinary performance and technology unlike anything currently on the road (or in the air, for that matter). However, anyone considering putting down a deposit on the electric supercar might want to read the reservation agreement carefully.

Despite unveiling an updated version of the Roadster nearly a decade after its original debut, Tesla still cannot guarantee when customers will receive their cars. In fact, the automaker explicitly warns that some reservation holders might never receive one at all.

InsideEVs first reported on the warning that appears in Tesla's Roadster reservation agreement, which customers must accept before securing a place in line. It's a particularly significant detail considering that certain versions require deposits of up to $250,000.

Tesla is currently targeting 2028 for production, following years of delays since the Roadster's initial unveiling in 2017. Even that timeline, however, isn't a firm commitment.

A Reservation Doesn't Guarantee A Roadster

The agreement states that the Roadster is still under development and that Tesla cannot guarantee when a vehicle will be delivered, or whether delivery will happen at all. Customers are essentially paying to secure an approximate position in the reservation queue.

Crucially, placing a reservation doesn't constitute an actual vehicle order or guarantee a production slot. Customers could therefore be committing substantial sums of money without any assurance that the car will actually enter production.

The document also makes clear that Tesla hasn't finalized the Roadster's pricing. Any estimated purchase price could change, while the vehicle's equipment, options, and features are still being developed.

Extraordinary Promises, But No Firm Delivery Date

Tesla's latest Roadster presentation showcased ambitious performance targets, including acceleration figures that would put it among the quickest vehicles ever conceived. The automaker has also demonstrated an experimental configuration featuring rocket-style thrusters capable of briefly lifting the car off the ground.

Those capabilities have generated tremendous excitement, although the production Roadster has yet to demonstrate them independently. Buyers also have no confirmed final specifications or delivery schedule to rely on.

The uncertainty is all the more surprising considering how long the Roadster project has been underway. Tesla originally unveiled the second-generation Roadster in 2017, but customers who reserved one back then are still waiting.

At Least The Deposits Are Refundable

There is some reassurance for anyone considering a reservation. Tesla's agreement allows customers to cancel their reservations and receive a refund before completing vehicle configuration. Refunds are also available if Tesla cannot deliver the car.

Reservations cannot be transferred to another person, although the agreement doesn't include a restriction preventing owners from reselling their cars after delivery, a restriction Tesla has previously used for certain limited-production vehicles.

The Roadster's latest unveiling has certainly renewed interest in Tesla's most ambitious performance car, but after nearly a decade of waiting, will that excitement eventually translate into customer deliveries?

Dozens of people who attended the Aftershock music festival in Sacramento, California, returned to find their vehicles missing from a nearby parking lot. Getting them back reportedly cost $562 each, and some drivers say their cars were damaged during the towing process.

The company responsible, J&B Towing, did not have a required Sacramento city towing permit, according to an October 16 CBS13 investigation. City employees have since visited the company's office and the dirt lot where vehicles were stored.

The towing operation took place during the October 1–4 festival at Discovery Park. Drivers had parked along Bercut Drive, near the festival grounds, before discovering that their vehicles had been removed.

What initially appeared to be an expensive parking dispute has grown into questions about towing authorization, business registration, damaged vehicles, and whether the company was legally permitted to conduct the operation.

A $562 Surprise

Embedded media follows; please allow a moment to load.

Bruce Capagli was among the drivers who found their vehicles missing after attending the festival.

According to an earlier CBS13 report, Capagli called a number posted near the parking lot and was directed to an office on Del Paso Boulevard.

There, he was required to pay $562 before being taken to another location to retrieve his car. Instead of a conventional towing facility, the vehicle was sitting in a dirt lot in a residential area.

Capagli also questioned the paperwork, which he said lacked his vehicle identification number, the time of towing, and the time his car was released.

He reported extensive damage that left his vehicle undrivable. According to Capagli, his insurance company was handling the incident as a vehicle theft rather than ordinary towing damage.

Other drivers described similar experiences, including paying the same retrieval fee.

Company Lacked Permit

Sacramento officials confirmed that J&B Towing received a business operations tax certificate on October 7, three days after the October 4 towing activity documented by CBS13.

However, the certificate is a business registration document, not authorization to operate a towing company.

As of October 16, J&B Towing still did not have a Sacramento city towing permit.

The company also had a federal Department of Transportation identification number, but that number does not establish permission to tow vehicles or replace local operating requirements.

CBS13 independently contacted officials in West Sacramento, where the company's DOT listing identified an address. Those officials reported finding no business license for J&B Towing in their city.

City code compliance employees subsequently visited the Del Paso Boulevard office and the unpermitted vehicle storage lot on Dale Avenue. They also photographed a trailer previously observed transporting vehicles during the festival weekend.

Authorization Under Scrutiny

The company's operating credentials were not the only concern.

Capagli told CBS13 that paperwork provided during the recovery process identified Allied Universal as the company that authorized the tow. He questioned whether the authorization was authentic.

Allied Universal disputed any involvement, explaining that its security services at the property were limited to guarding the lobby of one tenant's building. The company said it neither provided weekend guarding services at that location nor contracted with towing companies.

The towing company's owner previously maintained that the business was legitimate but did not provide CBS13 with requested licensing documents.

California Vehicle Code Section 22658 establishes requirements governing the removal of vehicles from private property, including rules concerning authorization, notification, and vehicle storage. Whether individual towing incidents violated those provisions has not been established.

City Reviews Complaints

The Sacramento Police Department received at least one police report concerning the towing activity.

Following CBS13's investigation, Sacramento officials said the city's code compliance division would coordinate with police as appropriate to determine further action.

The October 16 report showed city employees inspecting the locations associated with J&B Towing, but it did not establish that criminal charges had been filed.

Meanwhile, drivers have reported financial losses extending beyond the $562 retrieval charges, including vehicle damage requiring insurance involvement.

As of the latest report, the city had confirmed the missing towing permit, while the question of who authorized the removal of the vehicles remained unresolved.

A Florida judge has refused to pause a wrongful-death lawsuit against Tesla involving a 2021 Model 3 crash that killed two young people, allowing proceedings to continue after nearly five years of litigation.

Broward County Circuit Judge Michael A. Robinson denied Tesla's renewed request to halt proceedings during an October 16 hearing, according to Law360. Tesla wanted the case paused while it appeals an earlier decision refusing to move the trial from Broward County to Miami-Dade County.

The lawsuit stems from a September 2021 crash involving a Tesla Model 3 driven by 20-year-old Nicholas Garcia. He and his passenger, 19-year-old Jazmin Alcala, died after the vehicle left the road and struck two trees in Coral Gables.

Federal investigators concluded that Garcia's excessive speed caused the crash. Alcala's parents contend that defects in the vehicle also contributed to the collision. The litigation has since been complicated by repeated discovery disputes and court sanctions against Tesla.

A Crash Captured on Camera

On September 13, 2021, Garcia was driving his recently purchased 2021 Tesla Model 3 north on Alhambra Circle, with Alcala in the passenger seat.

Garcia passed another motorist by moving into the opposing traffic lane before returning to his own lane and accelerating toward the intersection with Coral Way. The other driver's dashboard camera captured the events leading to the crash.

The traffic signal changed to red before Garcia reached the intersection, but the Tesla continued through. Traveling at approximately 90 mph in a 30-mph zone, the vehicle crossed a change in roadway elevation that caused its suspension to compress fully and its undercarriage to strike the pavement.

Sparks flew from beneath the car. It subsequently lost control, entered a grassy median, and struck two trees. The second impact severely damaged the passenger side and the high-voltage battery, causing a fire that engulfed the vehicle within seconds.

The National Transportation Safety Board's final report, released in February 2023, provides a detailed reconstruction of the collision.

Investigators recovered five seconds of driving data after repairing a badly burned electronic chip by hand and installing it in another module. They compared the information with the witness's dashcam footage, confirming the vehicle's speed, the red-light violation and the absence of recorded service-brake application during the final five seconds.

The NTSB also found that the car's electronic stability-control system registered a fault shortly after the undercarriage struck the roadway. Investigators could not determine the precise cause of that fault, although they acknowledged that the resulting loss of electronic stability control may have further contributed to the loss of control.

Ultimately, the agency identified Garcia's decision to travel at excessive speed as the probable cause. Investigators found that the roadway design complied with applicable guidance and did not contribute to the crash.

Both occupants sustained extensive burns, but the NTSB concluded that their fatal injuries resulted from the violent collision rather than the subsequent fire. Medical findings included no soot in either occupant's airways and no detectable carbon monoxide in their blood.

Two Families Turn to the Courts

Alcala's parents, Etelvina and Jorge Alcala, filed a wrongful-death lawsuit in Broward County in January 2022 against Tesla and Garcia's estate.

Their complaint alleged that the Model 3's suspension, chassis, and related components were inadequately designed to withstand foreseeable driving conditions, contributing to the vehicle's loss of control.

Garcia's family filed a separate lawsuit the following month, naming Tesla entities and service manager Ignacio Socorro. That complaint alleged that Garcia had brought the nearly new Model 3 to a Tesla facility on September 9, four days before the crash, with concerns involving steering, suspension, the battery, electronic systems, and doors.

According to interviews conducted during the NTSB investigation, Garcia had owned the vehicle for approximately six days. His mother and a friend described a dispute with Tesla over a malfunctioning door or handle. Their accounts did not independently establish the broader mechanical complaints described in the lawsuit.

Garcia's estate initially sought to consolidate its lawsuit with the Alcala case but withdrew that request. On March 14, 2022, it voluntarily dismissed its separate action without prejudice. That dismissal did not resolve whether Tesla's vehicle was defective.

The estate remains involved as a defendant in Alcala's lawsuit and has joined the plaintiffs in seeking certain discovery materials and opposing Tesla's effort to relocate the trial.

Tesla disputes the allegations that a defective vehicle caused or contributed to the fatal crash. The key liability question is whether the Model 3 had an actionable defect that contributed to the outcome despite Garcia's extreme speed and failure to stop at the red light.

Years of Disputes Over Testing Records

The case developed into a prolonged fight over evidence concerning Tesla's internal testing, including reports and videos involving Model 3 vehicles traveling over raised roadway surfaces.

During discovery, the process through which opposing parties exchange evidence before trial, the plaintiffs sought records they considered relevant to whether Tesla knew about potential suspension or structural problems.

In October 2025, Judge Robinson sanctioned Tesla after finding that the company had violated earlier discovery orders. Among the issues was a late production of more than 123,000 pages of testing-related records that had been stripped of filenames and metadata, making the documents difficult to identify and connect with their original test reports.

The judge found that Tesla had intentionally made the material more difficult, time-consuming, and expensive for the plaintiffs to review. He ordered the company to pay reasonable attorney fees and associated expenses arising from the violations, with the amount to be determined separately.

The problems continued into 2026.

In August, Special Magistrate Charles M. Greene recommended additional sanctions after reviewing further failures to produce relevant testing records. His report noted that Tesla had identified 271 additional documents during a later review and disputed their significance.

Greene recommended an adverse evidentiary instruction concerning what Tesla's testing of similar vehicles revealed about structural problems. He also recommended additional document-production requirements, personal certifications from Tesla employees confirming compliance and further access to witnesses at the company's expense.

Robinson adopted the magistrate's recommendations in an October 2 order.

An adverse evidentiary instruction can affect how jurors evaluate disputed evidence. However, the sanctions do not constitute a judicial finding that a defect caused this particular collision. That issue remains for the trial, and the exact wording of any instruction ultimately delivered to jurors has not been established.

A Fight Over the Courthouse

As the parties prepared for trial, Tesla sought to transfer the case from Broward County to Miami-Dade County, where the crash occurred.

Tesla argued that most of the relevant witnesses are located in Miami-Dade and that conducting the trial in Broward would impose unnecessary burdens. The company maintained that Florida appellate decisions supported transferring cases involving vehicle crashes to the counties where they occurred.

The Alcala family opposed the request, pointing to the years already spent litigating before Robinson. Garcia's estate also opposed the transfer.

In September, Special Magistrate Greene recommended leaving the lawsuit in Broward. His findings addressed the extensive procedural history, the substantial discovery already conducted and the relatively short distance between the two courthouses.

On October 8, Robinson adopted the recommendation and denied Tesla's request. The judge noted that he had presided over the litigation for nearly five years and agreed with Greene's assessment of the evidence and legal issues.

Tesla filed a renewed motion the following day asking the court to suspend trial proceedings while it sought review from Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal.

In that filing, the company argued that going forward with a lengthy Broward County trial before the venue appeal was decided could waste judicial resources and deprive it of meaningful appellate review. It maintained that the plaintiffs' primary consequence of waiting would be another trial delay.

The plaintiffs opposed the stay.

According to Law360's account of the October 16 Zoom hearing, Robinson refused Tesla's request. The decision leaves the case proceeding in Broward County while the venue dispute continues through the appellate process, unless another court orders otherwise.

A Trial Still Ahead

Tesla's October 9 filing identified November 30, 2026, as the scheduled trial date. That schedule remains subject to additional court action.

Other pretrial questions remain unresolved. Tesla has filed motions seeking to exclude various categories of evidence, including arguments about the post-crash fire. The company's position is that the occupants suffered fatal blunt-force injuries before the fire, consistent with the NTSB's conclusion that the flames did not contribute to their deaths.

The larger disagreement concerns the Model 3's design and whether any alleged deficiency contributed to the loss of control or fatal injuries.

The NTSB's investigation determined the probable cause of the crash, but the agency does not decide civil liability. That distinction leaves the court to evaluate the families' allegations, Tesla's defenses, and the evidence presented under the applicable legal standards.

The October 16 ruling does not establish that Tesla was responsible for the collision, nor does it resolve the company's venue appeal. It means the trial proceedings can continue while those questions remain contested.

Nearly five years after the crash, the federal investigation has established what happened on the roadway. The civil lawsuit has yet to determine whether Tesla bears any legal responsibility for the deaths.

A routine oil change turned into an unexpected battery replacement after a driver visited Valvoline and received a test result that left employees questioning how the vehicle had started at all.

The driver shared a photograph of the results on Reddit's r/MechanicAdvice community on September 29, 2026. According to the post, Valvoline employees described the battery as the worst they had ever seen.

What made the situation unusual was that the owner hadn't noticed anything wrong. The vehicle reportedly started normally, despite the testing equipment displaying a reading of zero cold cranking amps.

The driver was already having the battery replaced when they posted the photograph, but the numbers sparked a discussion about whether the battery was genuinely failing or the equipment had produced a misleading result.

Zero Starting Power

Embedded media follows; please allow a moment to load.

How's my battery this shot?

The Valvoline testing screen displayed a red "BAD & REPLACE" warning. It listed the battery's rated capacity as 750 cold cranking amps (CCA), while the measured output was shown as 0 CCA.

Cold cranking amps measure a battery's ability to supply starting current under specified cold-weather conditions. A battery rated at 750 CCA is designed to deliver substantially more starting power than a weak or deteriorated battery.

Yet the same screen showed a 94% state of charge and a voltage reading of 12.55 volts.

Those numbers are not necessarily contradictory. Voltage and state of charge describe different characteristics than the battery's ability to deliver high current. A deteriorated battery can retain voltage but struggle under the heavy electrical demand of starting an engine.

However, a literal zero-CCA result was difficult to reconcile with the owner's report that the vehicle continued starting without trouble. That discrepancy quickly became the focus of the discussion.

Commenters Question Results

Several Reddit users suspected the test had been performed incorrectly. One commenter pointed out that the vehicle had apparently arrived under its own power, making the employees' description of the battery particularly questionable.

Others suggested poor contact between the tester clamps and battery terminals could have affected the reading. Another possibility raised was that the equipment had been configured for the wrong type of battery.

The screen identified the battery as "FLOODED," referring to a conventional flooded lead-acid design. If the vehicle instead had an absorbent glass mat (AGM) battery, selecting the incorrect chemistry could compromise the test's accuracy.

These possibilities are consistent with guidance from battery diagnostic equipment manufacturer Midtronics, which identifies incorrect battery settings, unsuitable testing conditions, and poor connections as potential causes of misleading results.

The company recommends checking the testing setup when results conflict with the vehicle's actual behavior, rather than automatically accepting the initial diagnosis.

None of those possibilities establishes that the Valvoline employees made a mistake. The photograph does not show how the equipment was connected, whether the selected battery type was correct, or whether a second test was performed.

Replacement Already Underway

The owner explained that the Valvoline visit was a last-minute decision before an upcoming trip because their usual mechanic shop was closed.

In a follow-up comment, they indicated that the experience had reinforced their preference for their regular shop.

Other commenters acknowledged that replacing an aging battery before traveling could still be reasonable, particularly if its age and condition were unknown. However, they questioned whether the dramatic test result alone justified the conclusion that the battery was completely incapable of starting the vehicle.

A second properly configured battery test, with good terminal contact, could have helped determine whether the zero-CCA reading reflected an actual failure or a testing problem.

The original post did not identify the vehicle, disclose the battery's age, or provide results from an independent test. The owner had already decided to replace the battery, leaving the accuracy of Valvoline's original measurement unresolved.

Rockstar Games has released the official launch trailer for *Grand Theft Auto VI*, giving fans another look at Vice City, its two protagonists, and the criminal underworld awaiting players when the game arrives November 19, 2026.

Published October 15, the roughly 90-second trailer quickly gained attention online, arriving more than a month before the long-awaited sequel's release. The video offers cinematic footage, new story details, and original music from French electronic duo Justice.

The trailer opens with Jason discussing his troubled departure from the military before shifting toward his relationship with Lucia, the game's other playable protagonist. Their partnership sits at the center of a sprawling criminal conspiracy in Leonida, Rockstar's fictional version of Florida.

The timing is especially notable. More than 13 years after *Grand Theft Auto V* launched in September 2013, Rockstar is preparing to release its successor. Rather than another lengthy presentation of game mechanics, the company has chosen to showcase the atmosphere, characters, and music that will define its newest open-world crime story.

Inside the Trailer

Embedded media follows; please allow a moment to load.

The footage begins with Jason reflecting on his military background, suggesting that his departure from the armed forces was anything but straightforward. His connection with Lucia becomes increasingly important as the trailer progresses.

According to Rockstar's official announcement, the pair become entangled in a conspiracy stretching across Leonida after a seemingly straightforward criminal job goes wrong.

The trailer emphasizes Vice City's distinctive atmosphere, combining sun-soaked streets, nightlife, violence, and the criminal activity that has defined the franchise for decades.

Despite its launch-trailer designation, the video concentrates on cinematic storytelling rather than explaining gameplay systems or introducing specific new mechanics.

Justice Takes Center Stage

One of the trailer's biggest revelations concerns the game's soundtrack.

Rockstar confirmed that French electronic duo Justice composed the original score for *Grand Theft Auto VI*, bringing their distinctive electronic sound to the franchise.

The trailer features their new single, "Flower in a Hurricane," featuring Tame Impala, SZA, and King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard.

The song is also included on Grand Theft Auto VI: The Album, which Rockstar has made available for pre-save on major streaming platforms and pre-order on physical formats.

Music has long been an important component of the *Grand Theft Auto* series, particularly through its fictional radio stations. Justice's involvement also gives the upcoming game an original musical identity beyond its licensed tracks.

Unusual Trailer Timing

Releasing a launch trailer more than a month before the game becomes available is an unusual marketing decision, particularly for such a highly anticipated title.

The trailer also arrives amid reports of unfinished gameplay footage circulating online. However, Rockstar has not publicly established a connection between those leaks and its October 15 announcement.

The company had already offered a much more substantial look at the game on August 27, when it released an extended presentation examining the upcoming title.

That earlier footage provided more extensive information about the game's world and features. The new trailer instead returns the focus to Jason, Lucia, and the cinematic presentation of Vice City.

November Release Confirmed

Rockstar continues to list November 19, 2026, as the official release date for *Grand Theft Auto VI* on PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X|S.

The game returns players to Vice City, the fictional Miami-inspired location previously featured in *Grand Theft Auto: Vice City* and *Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories*.

This time, the setting extends across Leonida, introducing a larger fictional Florida landscape and a story built around two central characters.

The official GTA VI website also lists pre-orders for the standard game and an Ultimate Edition, alongside additional information about its characters, locations, and music.

Rockstar has not announced a PC release date.

An 800-horsepower Nissan Skyline GT-R R34 built by a Japanese enthusiast nearly two decades ago gave two automotive YouTubers a frightening introduction to Osaka's nighttime driving scene.

In a May 8, 2026 video, DailyDrivenExotics joined Steve Hammes of Steve's POV to examine a heavily modified Skyline owned by a longtime Japanese car enthusiast named Tokichi. The car combines an extensively rebuilt engine, handmade Kevlar bodywork, and an unusual exhaust arrangement.

The Skyline reportedly produces about 800 horsepower from a modified 2.8-liter engine. Its owner has spent years developing the build, including multiple engine failures before arriving at its current configuration.

The hosts eventually took the car onto Osaka's elevated expressways, where its acceleration left them visibly shaken. The encounter also introduced viewers to a second R34 GT-R equipped with a Nismo-built engine and a remarkably clean Nissan Silvia S15.

A Handmade Skyline

Embedded media follows; please allow a moment to load.

Tokichi explained that he and his friends originally built the Skyline roughly 17 years before the filming. He had previously worked on the earlier R32 and R33 generations before turning his attention to the R34.

One of the car's most unusual features is its handmade Kevlar front end. Rather than purchasing a commercial body kit, Tokichi reportedly created his own molds to fabricate the panels.

Underneath, the car features a flat underbody, while its interior has been stripped to two seats. The rear compartment contains a large camera mount dating to the era when recording driving footage required bulky camcorders rather than compact action cameras.

Its modified RB-series engine displaces 2.8 liters, compared with the factory RB26DETT's 2.6 liters. The owner described a progression of engine builds, with repeated failures preceding the current setup.

For perspective, Nissan's factory specifications list the R34 GT-R at 276 horsepower, making Tokichi's claimed output nearly three times the official factory figure.

The car also features a large exhaust outlet routed through the rear compartment, external wastegate plumbing, and a substantial fuel system with a surge tank. A surge tank helps maintain a consistent fuel supply during demanding driving conditions.

Another Rare GT-R

Tokichi also showed the visitors his wife's white R34 GT-R V-Spec, which features a Nismo S1 engine.

Unlike the aggressively modified blue Skyline, the white car retains a more conventional appearance and a considerably more comfortable interior.

The V-Spec was already an important upgrade over the standard GT-R. Nissan equipped the performance-oriented version with specialized suspension tuning, aerodynamic components, and an active rear limited-slip differential.

The Nismo S1 engine adds another layer of interest. Rather than focusing exclusively on peak horsepower, Nismo's S-series engine philosophy emphasizes careful assembly, engine response, and balanced performance.

The comparison between the two GT-Rs showed how differently enthusiasts can approach the same platform: one built for extreme performance and the other focused on a refined driving experience.

An Osaka Night Drive

The group eventually headed onto Osaka's elevated expressways, a setting closely associated with Japan's modified-car culture.

Tokichi's blue Skyline immediately demonstrated why his passengers had been warned about its performance.

After the drive, the hosts described the experience as frightening, with one comparing its intensity to high-speed laps at Germany's Nürburgring. The conversation later suggested that the car had not even been operating at its maximum boost setting.

The group also encountered a white Nissan Silvia S15, another celebrated Japanese performance car. Introduced in 1999, the S15 was the final generation of Nissan's Silvia and is particularly popular among drifting enthusiasts because of its rear-wheel-drive layout and extensive aftermarket support.

The video closes with a broader discussion about Japan's automotive heritage and the growing number of collectible Japanese vehicles leaving the country for overseas buyers.

For American enthusiasts, the R34 is particularly relevant because cars manufactured at least 25 years ago can generally qualify for a federal exemption from certain vehicle safety import requirements. That has opened the door for more R34s to enter the United States as individual vehicles become eligible.

A Florida Tesla owner confronted at gunpoint outside his own garage spent nearly two years fighting a criminal reckless driving charge. In July 2026, a Seminole County judge acquitted him after his defense presented footage recorded by the car.

Kevin Finley was returning home in Winter Springs when a police officer accused him of fleeing an attempted traffic stop. Finley maintained that he had never seen the patrol vehicle following him, and the encounter ended with four citations, including a criminal misdemeanor carrying potential jail time.

The officer's description of Finley's driving would eventually face scrutiny in court, where prosecutors argued that his maneuver endangered other motorists. The judge initially allowed the criminal case to proceed, then reconsidered after watching the Tesla footage and hearing Finley's testimony.

The August 2024 confrontation has attracted renewed attention following an October 16 video from The Civil Rights Lawyer, featuring police body-camera recordings, an extended interview with Finley, and details from the recently concluded trial.

A Turn That Escalated

Embedded media follows; please allow a moment for it to load.

The encounter began near State Road 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard, where newly installed traffic signals had not yet been activated. With the lights covered and traffic moving continuously through the intersection, drivers waiting to turn left had to find openings in oncoming traffic.

Finley testified that a vehicle ahead of him had moved toward the median and appeared to be preparing for a U-turn. After watching several opportunities to turn pass without the other driver moving, he proceeded around the vehicle and turned left onto Michael Blake Boulevard.

Winter Springs Police Officer Erik Schwartz, waiting on the opposite side of the intersection, described a more dangerous maneuver. He testified that Finley passed multiple vehicles from a through lane, forced oncoming motorists to brake, and accelerated rapidly enough for his Tesla to begin fishtailing.

Schwartz estimated that the car subsequently reached at least 40 mph on Michael Blake Boulevard, where the posted limit was 25 mph. He activated his emergency lights and siren, turned around, and attempted to catch up.

By the time the officer reached Finley's neighborhood, the Tesla was entering a garage. Finley testified that he had not seen the patrol vehicle or realized anyone was attempting to stop him. Hearing sirens outside after closing the garage door, he reopened it to investigate.

Body-camera footage shows Schwartz drawing his firearm, ordering Finley outside, directing him to his knees, and placing him in handcuffs. The driver complied while repeatedly insisting that he had never seen the officer following him.

Four Citations and a Camera

As additional officers arrived, the recordings captured discussions about whether Finley's driving constituted felony fleeing or warranted traffic citations. Schwartz maintained that the driver must have seen his emergency lights, while Finley continued explaining that he had simply returned home.

The officer ultimately issued four citations. According to Seminole County court records, they involved criminal reckless driving, improper passing, failure to yield to an emergency vehicle, and operating a vehicle with an expired registration.

Despite the accusations made during the confrontation, Finley was never charged with felony fleeing and eluding. Florida law requires a driver to knowingly and willfully disregard an officer's order to stop for the basic fleeing offense. Finley maintained that he could not have deliberately ignored a patrol car he never realized was pursuing him.

He also told officers that his Tesla recorded its surroundings. Once released, he immediately retrieved the storage device, concerned that continued recording could overwrite the footage, and transferred its contents to his computer.

The patrol vehicle, meanwhile, lacked a dashboard camera. Although Schwartz's body camera recorded the pursuit and confrontation, it did not provide the same view of the original turn, leaving the officer's observations and Finley's account to be examined against the Tesla recording.

Two Accounts Under Oath

The competing descriptions remained central when the case reached trial on July 16, 2026, before Seminole County Judge Debra Krause.

Schwartz testified that Finley had bypassed multiple vehicles, entered the intersection from a through lane, and caused oncoming drivers to brake to avoid a collision. He also stood by his earlier sworn description of the Tesla losing traction during the turn.

Finley disputed the number of vehicles involved and insisted that he remained within the turning lane and median. He said no other motorists had to brake or swerve, denied that the car fishtailed, and maintained that he had enough room to complete the maneuver safely.

Prosecutor Chaerim Lee questioned Finley about the acceleration capabilities of his dual-motor Tesla Model 3 Long Range, although the testimony established no measured acceleration rate during the encounter. Officer Vincent Maine, who had responded as backup, acknowledged that he had neither witnessed the driving nor reviewed footage of the original maneuver.

After prosecutors rested their case, defense attorney Ethan Carlos moved for a judgment of acquittal, citing Florida appellate decisions distinguishing improper traffic maneuvers from criminal recklessness. Among them was Berube v. State, a 2008 decision involving an improper left turn across oncoming traffic.

Krause initially denied the motion, finding enough evidence at that stage for jurors to consider the charge. The defense then called Finley to testify and introduced the Tesla recording, which prosecutors did not object to admitting.

Carlos renewed the motion after the defense rested, arguing that the video undermined Schwartz's account and that the prosecution had failed to establish the willful or wanton disregard for safety required for criminal reckless driving.

The Judge Reconsiders

Krause granted the renewed motion, concluding that the evidence supported careless driving and possibly speeding, but fell short of the criminal standard under Florida's reckless driving statute. A first conviction under that law can carry up to 90 days in jail.

"The officer's testimony alone, I mean, would suffice to do a careless driving, but reckless, that is a much more elevated charge than that," Krause explained.

Lee argued that the conflicting testimony and recordings presented factual questions for the jury. The judge nevertheless found insufficient evidence that Finley had intentionally, knowingly, or purposefully driven with disregard for the safety of people or property.

Jurors were released without returning a verdict.

An exchange after the ruling exposed a disagreement about the officer's testimony. Krause recalled that Schwartz had described no braking, honking, swerving, or other evasive action by nearby motorists. Lee pointed out that he had testified that oncoming drivers applied their brakes to prevent a collision.

The prosecutor was correct about that portion of his testimony. Krause acknowledged that she had missed it, but the judgment of acquittal stood.

The Seminole County docket confirms that the reckless driving charge ended in acquittal on July 16, 2026. The judge also dismissed the expired-registration and failure-to-yield citations.

Finley entered a no-contest plea to improper passing, with adjudication withheld and a $300 fine. Court records show that he paid the amount in full that same day.

After the Criminal Case

In September 17 reporting, FOX 35 Orlando cited a statement from Winter Springs Police Chief Matt Tracht, who declined to address the specific case because of what he described as pending litigation.

Tracht explained that officers frequently have limited information about drivers' intentions or potential weapons during traffic stops, with erratic or reckless driving increasing their concerns.

Finley has questioned the justification for the gunpoint confrontation. In his October interview with attorney John Bryan, he described the experience as frightening and said he became uncomfortable driving around police afterward.

He also reported submitting a seven-page complaint to the Winter Springs Police Department after his criminal case concluded. According to Finley, a lieutenant accepted the document but gave no definite answer about whether the department would respond.

By the time of the interview, he said he had heard nothing further. He was consulting attorneys about potential civil action but confirmed that no lawsuit had been filed.

Whether the department has investigated his complaint or reviewed Schwartz's conduct remains unconfirmed.

A wrongful death lawsuit against Ford Motor Co. has been settled after a 79-year-old Texas man was fatally run over by his own 2023 Ford F-250. His family alleged it began moving despite being parked.

Roy “Mack” Irwin died in June 2024 while visiting a friend's home in New Braunfels, Texas. Surveillance footage captured the pickup moving forward and backward before Irwin chased the vehicle and attempted to regain control.

His daughter, Shelby Lane Reynolds, sued Ford, Bluebonnet Ford owner Kahlig Enterprises, and Northwest Automotive Warehouse, alleging a defective transmission, improper dealership servicing, and interference with the truck's automatic emergency-braking system.

The case was scheduled for trial in October 2026 but settled before reaching a jury. According to October 15 coverage from Hoodline, the settlement amounts and conditions have not been publicly disclosed.

Fatal Incident Captured

A February 2025 statement from Wigington Rumley Evans & Blair, the law firm representing Irwin's family, described his final moments.

Irwin had driven to a friend's house to collect donations for a church function. He reportedly left the truck running with a passenger inside after shifting into Park. The F-250 began moving back and forth. The passenger tried to stop it but couldn't regain control, prompting Irwin to approach the open driver's door.

As the pickup continued moving toward the street, Irwin chased it and attempted to climb inside. He was pulled beneath the vehicle and suffered fatal injuries. Attorney Jeff Wigington described the surveillance recording in a January 2025 interview with KENS 5.

"You can see the truck moving back and forth three times," Wigington said.

Previous Transmission Complaint

Reynolds alleged that Irwin had previously taken his pickup to Bluebonnet Ford because it would not remain in Park.

Her lawsuit accused Ford of manufacturing a defective transmission and failing to adequately warn drivers about the danger. She also claimed the dealership negligently serviced the truck.

Wigington said his legal team had identified consumer complaints involving Ford F-250 transmission problems, including complaints submitted to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. However, the lawsuit did not establish the specific mechanical cause of Irwin's accident.

The complaint also alleged that an aftermarket grille guard installed by Northwest Automotive Warehouse interfered with the vehicle's pedestrian-detection and automatic emergency braking systems.

Ford Denies Responsibility

Ford and Bluebonnet Ford denied the allegations, disputing claims that the truck was defective or that its servicing caused the accident. The defendants also argued that Irwin bore some responsibility, including claims that he had not properly secured the vehicle in Park or responded to warnings.

Ford maintained that the pickup met applicable federal safety standards, while Northwest Automotive Warehouse disputed the allegations involving the grille guard.

The case ended without a jury determination establishing whether a vehicle defect, servicing problem, or aftermarket accessory contributed to Irwin's death.

Settlement Before Trial

Reynolds reached a settlement with Northwest Automotive Warehouse in June 2026.

Ford and Bluebonnet Ford subsequently resolved their disputes with the family. On July 31, Reynolds and the remaining defendants jointly requested dismissal of the claims. The agreements came before a trial scheduled for the week of October 12, 2026.

The parties have not publicly disclosed how much money was paid or whether the agreements included any additional conditions. As of October 15, publicly reported court records did not show signed orders formally dismissing the claims.

A 2019 BMW X1 owner is questioning a repair bill of about $4,500 after a mechanic reportedly changed diagnoses several times and kept the SUV for nine weeks.

The driver brought the vehicle to a local repair shop in mid-August after hearing an engine whistle and seeing a drivetrain warning on the dashboard. Suspecting a turbocharger problem, the owner sought a professional diagnosis.

What followed was a series of delays, unexpected repair recommendations, and conflicting explanations about the engine's condition. At one point, the mechanic reportedly claimed the engine had blown, then reversed that assessment days later.

The owner described the experience in an October 16 Reddit post, asking whether the escalating charges were reasonable and whether the shop could be held responsible for an apparent misdiagnosis.

Conflicting Repair Diagnoses

Please read - Repair Bill seems crazy
by
u/True-You-1043 in
autorepair

For the first two weeks, the mechanic reportedly did not examine the BMW because of staffing shortages. When work finally began, the shop recommended replacing the engine mounts and bushings and servicing the brake fluid, and the owner authorized it.

Shortly afterward, the mechanic claimed the engine had suffered a catastrophic failure, producing black smoke and requiring workers to shut it down manually.

The shop blamed insufficient engine oil. However, the owner maintained that the BMW had been serviced in January and had displayed no low-oil warning.

Three days later, the mechanic said the engine was repairable. Further discussions eventually revealed a failed turbocharger, despite the shop previously assuring the owner the component remained usable.

The mechanic then struggled to source a replacement, alternating between buying a reconditioned turbocharger and ordering one from a BMW dealership.

Repair Charges Questioned

The unfinished bill included approximately $2,000 for the initial maintenance and repairs, plus another $2,500 for the turbocharger replacement and labor.

The shop reportedly characterized the earlier work as necessary because of ordinary wear and tear.

The owner believes the mechanic failed to identify the original problem and may have allowed additional engine damage to occur. However, no independent inspection or diagnostic documentation has been provided to substantiate that claim.

One Reddit commenter recommended requesting a written chronology of the work, including diagnostic tests, their results, and the owner's repair authorizations.

BMW's Turbo Guidance

A March 2024 BMW service bulletin addresses turbocharger failures associated with restricted engine oil supply and return lines.

BMW explains that inadequate lubrication can cause a turbocharger to seize. The manufacturer instructs technicians replacing a turbocharger to inspect the oil lines for blockages, damage, or contamination that could contribute to further failures.

The 2019 BMW X1 owner's manual also describes an electronic engine-oil monitoring system. A current measurement generally requires about 30 minutes of driving, so shorter trips may show an earlier reading.

Neither document establishes what caused this owner's engine trouble or whether the mechanic performed the repairs incorrectly.

According to the Reddit post, the shop expects to have the BMW ready the following week. The owner has not reported receiving a completed invoice or resolving the disputed charges.

Getting your mailbox knocked over by a passing vehicle is frustrating enough the first time, but imagine having to replace it eight separate times. One Tennessee man apparently reached his breaking point and decided that his next mailbox would need something considerably stronger than a traditional wooden post.

TikTok creator Travis (@builtbytravis), who appears to be based in Cookeville, Tennessee, recently shared a video documenting his solution to a problem that seemingly refuses to go away. After watching his mailbox get struck repeatedly, he decided to reinforce its replacement with concrete and wood, hoping the additional strength would finally put an end to the destruction.

Of course, building a sturdier mailbox sounds perfectly reasonable until people start questioning what might happen if another vehicle crashes into it. While some viewers praised Travis for protecting his property, others raised concerns about whether such a rigid structure could seriously injure a driver or create legal problems.

Nevertheless, Travis seems determined to find out whether his latest creation can survive whatever comes its way, although he doesn't appear entirely convinced that the problem is over. "After 8 hits, I decided the mailbox needed a little more than a replacement," he explained, joking that he hoped he wouldn't need to make another installment documenting its destruction.

Tennessee Man Reinforces Mailbox With Concrete After Eight Vehicle Strikes

Embedded TikTok video follows; please give it a moment to load completely.

@builtbytravis After 8 hits, I decided the mailbox needed a little more than a replacement. Concrete, wood, and a whole lot of optimism that I won't be making a Part 3. Place your bets. How long do we think this one lasts? #cookevilletn #contractorlife #generalcontractor #businessowner #homeimprovement ♬ Paper Moon Static - Marnie Cusk

In his TikTok video, Travis showcased his reinforced mailbox project, which combines concrete and wood in an attempt to prevent another passing vehicle from easily knocking it down. Considering that previous replacements apparently failed to survive the area's traffic, it's understandable why he might have lost faith in conventional mailbox posts.

"Concrete, wood, and a whole lot of optimism that I won't be making a Part 3," Travis wrote in the video's description. He even invited viewers to predict how long the new mailbox would last, suggesting that eight previous collisions haven't exactly inspired confidence in the driving habits of people passing his property.

Interestingly, one commenter claimed to drive past the mailbox regularly and confirmed that the repeated damage had become something of a neighborhood spectacle. "I drive by your mailbox every day. I felt so bad it seemed like every time you got it fixed it went down within 2 days," the viewer wrote, adding that seeing Travis pour concrete was particularly amusing.

Viewers Defend Concrete Mailbox as Others Raise Safety Concerns

While some viewers questioned the potential danger of hitting such a rigid structure, others argued that drivers should be responsible for keeping their vehicles on the road in the first place. "Everyone saying someone can die hitting this. The driver could literally kill someone because they don't know how to drive," one commenter wrote, while another joked that people criticizing the project must have experience hitting mailboxes themselves.

Another viewer defended Travis by writing, "Sounds like a lot of people in these comments struggle to miss mailboxes." At the same time, someone else suggested adding reflectors to improve visibility and discourage future excuses from drivers. However, the debate also raised questions about whether a reinforced mailbox could comply with roadside safety requirements, which vary depending on the location and the applicable rules.

Despite the concerns, plenty of commenters supported Travis's decision, with one writing, "People need to drive better," and another questioning why drivers were being excused for repeatedly leaving the roadway. Whether the new mailbox survives its next encounter remains to be seen, but after eight previous hits, Travis is clearly hoping that concrete will succeed where ordinary replacements couldn't.

Trading in a vehicle can be bittersweet, especially when you've spent years enjoying it and putting thousands of miles on the odometer. However, one Oklahoma Mustang owner's recent experience became even more frustrating when he discovered just how much his former car was worth to a dealership.

The owner took to Reddit's r/Mustang community on October 15 to share what happened after trading in his 2007 Ford Mustang GT. According to his post, the dealership gave him $11,000 for the vehicle before listing it for approximately $18,000.

What's especially interesting is that the owner originally purchased the Mustang in 2022 for $16,000, when it had around 60,000 miles on the odometer. By the time he traded it in, that number had climbed to nearly 107,000 miles, making the dealership's asking price all the more surprising.

The situation has sparked a discussion among fellow Mustang enthusiasts about used-car pricing, dealership markups, and whether older performance cars are worth their increasingly hefty price tags. While dealerships naturally need to make money on trade-ins, the difference between what this owner received and what the dealership is asking certainly caught people's attention.

Oklahoma Dealership Lists 2007 Mustang GT for Thousands More Than Trade-in Value

Embedded Reddit post follows; please give it a moment to load completely.

This is just insane pricing
by
u/DiceloConejo in
Mustang

In his Reddit post, the owner explained that he decided to check the dealership's website to see whether his old Mustang had been listed for sale. He wasn't prepared to discover that the car was being advertised for more than he originally paid for it four years earlier.

The vehicle appears in listings for Jim Norton Toyota in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as a 2007 Ford Mustang GT Premium with a 4.6-liter V8 engine, five-speed manual transmission, and approximately 106,970 miles. A listing on Cars.com shows an asking price of $18,007, while a separate indexed dealership listing displayed a higher price, demonstrating that advertised prices can vary between platforms or change over time.

The difference between the owner's stated $11,000 trade-in value and the approximately $18,000 advertised price is roughly $7,000, although that doesn't necessarily translate into dealership profit. Reconditioning, inspections, overhead, and negotiations can affect the eventual margin, and there's no indication yet of what the Mustang will actually sell for.

Please note that the Mustang GT used in the featured image is not associated with the in question.

Mustang Enthusiasts Question Whether the Dealership's Asking Price Makes Sense

The Reddit discussion quickly turned into a debate about how much older Mustangs should cost, with one commenter comparing the owner's original purchase to their own experience. They wrote, "I can't believe you paid $16k for a 2007 in 2022," explaining that they purchased a 2006 Mustang for $18,000 back in 2009 with only 12,000 miles.

Another commenter questioned the dealership's asking price despite believing the owner received a reasonable trade-in offer. They suggested that the dealership was asking the kind of money buyers might spend on a newer 5.0-liter Mustang, rather than an older 4.6-liter GT.

Interestingly, the original poster clarified that he was actually satisfied with the $11,000 trade-in offer because he had expected considerably less. He also explained that he wanted to avoid the inconvenience of selling the Mustang privately, although he was surprised to see the dealership's photos still showing his old license plate, keychain, dashboard decoration, and window sticker.

Comments Question the Price of an Older Mustang

Some commenters were particularly critical of the Mustang's asking price, with one writing, "It's as clean as a 2007 100k mile GT gets. But $18k is crazy." Another commenter predicted that the vehicle would sit on the dealership's lot for a long time, suggesting that finding a buyer at that price might prove difficult.

Others offered a different perspective, pointing out that the market for older Mustangs has changed considerably over the years. One commenter wrote, "Mustangs are only going up in value. Love it!" while another attributed the higher asking price to what they described as a sports-car premium.

Perhaps the most interesting reaction came from a commenter who questioned why the dealership was still displaying the previous owner's personal accessories in its listing photos. The original poster confirmed that he had left his license plate, keychain, dashboard bobblehead, and rear-quarter-window sticker behind, adding another unexpected detail to an already unusual trade-in experience.

A Tesla driver said he was asleep and using driver-assistance technology when his car crashed into a California Highway Patrol vehicle, seriously injuring the two officers inside, the CHP reported in an October 15 post.

The collision happened Tuesday night, October 13, on Interstate 80 in Fairfield, west of Air Base Parkway, NBC Bay Area reported. The officers were responding to a separate deadly crash when the Tesla entered the crash site and struck their parked patrol car.

CHP subsequently posted video of the collision online, and both officers are recovering.

Whether Tesla's Full Self-Driving feature was active at the moment of impact remains unconfirmed in NBC's report. The driver's account of using assistance therefore cannot establish which system, if any, was controlling the car when it hit the officers.

At the Wheel

Embedded media follows; please allow a moment for it to load.

Tesla's instructions leave no room for sleeping while using Full Self-Driving (Supervised). The company describes it as an advanced driver-assistance system intended for a fully attentive driver, rather than a replacement for the person behind the wheel.

The software can change lanes, follow navigation routes, maneuver around other vehicles and objects, and make turns. Those capabilities still require active supervision. Tesla places responsibility for speed and vehicle control on the driver whether the feature is enabled or not.

Its Model 3 owner's manual describes two different camera functions. Cameras mounted at the front, rear, left, and right supply information about the car's surroundings, while a cabin camera monitors driver attentiveness. The system also displays escalating warnings requiring a driver response. These are the documented safeguards for that model, rather than confirmation of how the Tesla involved in the Fairfield crash was equipped or operated.

The manual also warns that drivers may need to intervene in construction zones, on narrow roads with oncoming traffic, or at complex intersections. Dirty or obstructed cameras, rain, and faded lane markings can affect performance. Tesla instructs owners to ensure the cameras are unobstructed and calibrated before use. Drivers must be prepared to take immediate action as road conditions change.

For drivers who need to intervene, Tesla's support instructions list pressing the brake pedal or taking over the steering as ways to disengage Full Self-Driving (Supervised).

A 20-year-old Connecticut driver will avoid prison after pleading guilty to charges stemming from a deadly motorcycle crash caused by distracted driving. Police determined that she crossed into oncoming traffic while looking at the infotainment screen in her Mercedes-Benz SUV.

Anngelina Morton received a 10-year suspended prison sentence and five years of probation on October 15, 2026, for the August 2024 crash in Farmington that killed 31-year-old Justin Gittings and injured two other motorcyclists.

The Mercedes crossed more than four feet over the double yellow centerline on Waterville Road before striking the motorcycles. Morton told police she had looked at the vehicle's infotainment display after receiving a notification.

The sentencing comes more than two years after the collision and follows a lengthy police investigation, criminal proceedings, and a separate wrongful-death lawsuit filed by Gittings' family.

Fatal Mercedes Crash

Embedded media follows; please allow a moment to load.

On August 20, 2024, Morton was driving southbound on Waterville Road, also known as Route 10, when her Mercedes crossed into the northbound lane near Farmington Avenue.

According to the Farmington Police Department's March 2025 release, the North Central Regional Accident Reconstruction Squad completed an investigation that resulted in an arrest warrant for Morton.

Police determined that she was responsible for the collision involving two motorcycles.

Gittings was transported by LIFE STAR helicopter to Hartford Hospital with severe injuries to his head and lower body. He remained hospitalized for 34 days before dying on September 23, 2024.

Two people riding the second motorcycle also suffered injuries.

Dashboard Distraction

The investigation focused on what drew Morton's attention away from the road immediately before the collision.

According to WFSB's reporting on the police investigation, Morton told police she had been looking at her Mercedes' infotainment center.

Police determined that the SUV traveled approximately 4.14 feet across the double yellow line and remained in the opposing lane for at least five seconds before impact.

A separate wrongful-death complaint filed by Gittings' estate identifies the vehicle as a 2021 Mercedes-Benz GLE 350 4Matic.

The lawsuit alleges that Morton was distracted by a cellphone connected to the SUV's hands-free interface.

It also alleges she had previously received distracted-driving instruction and signed an agreement prohibiting cellphone use while operating a vehicle.

Those additional claims come from the civil complaint and are separate from the findings established in the criminal proceedings.

Arrest and Sentencing

Morton was arrested on March 6, 2025, after police completed their investigation. She faced second-degree manslaughter, two counts of second-degree assault, reckless driving, distracted driving, and other traffic charges.

She was released after posting a $275,000 bond and initially pleaded not guilty.

In September 2026, Morton changed her plea to guilty to second-degree manslaughter and two counts of second-degree assault.

At her October 15 sentencing, Hartford Superior Court Judge Moira Buckley imposed a suspended 10-year prison sentence and five years of probation.

According to NBC Connecticut, the judge considered Morton's age when determining the punishment. She had turned 18 just five days before the collision.

The conditions of her probation require Morton to donate $2,000 annually to a charity selected by the victims, read victim impact statements each year on the anniversary of the crash, write apology letters, and speak publicly about distracted driving.

She must also pay a $5,000 fine.

Family Addresses Court

Seventeen people delivered victim impact statements during the sentencing hearing, including family members and the two motorcyclists who survived the collision.

Gittings, originally from Seymour, lived in Meriden and worked as a truck driver.

His family described the lasting impact of his death, while the surviving riders discussed injuries and trauma they continue to experience.

Morton apologized during the hearing and expressed remorse for causing the collision.

The case also remains the subject of a civil wrongful-death action brought by Gittings' estate against Morton and the Mercedes' owner, Tammi Morton.

The complaint seeks damages over the collision, including allegations of negligence and recklessness.

The criminal sentence does not resolve those separate civil claims.

A Florida Tesla owner turned to Reddit after receiving an estimate of about $4,300 to repair the air conditioning system in a 2022 Model 3 Performance. The owner said the system would occasionally produce cold air for several minutes before stopping, making the problem particularly frustrating in South Florida's heat.

The vehicle had approximately 56,000 miles, putting it beyond Tesla's standard 50,000-mile basic warranty. According to the owner, the service center initially estimated the repair at $1,600, then raised it to roughly $4,300 after keeping the vehicle for 24 hours.

The driver shared the estimate in the r/TeslaModel3 subreddit and asked other owners for recommendations. Responses ranged from seeking a goodwill repair to investigating whether a relatively inexpensive temperature sensor could be responsible.

The discussion raised questions about whether such an expensive repair was necessary, especially after several commenters described similar air-conditioning symptoms that they said resolved without replacing major components.

A Costly Diagnosis

I can’t afford this! any recommendations
by
u/Available-Ad-8369 in
TeslaModel3

The owner explained that the Model 3's air conditioning would sometimes work for five to ten minutes before losing cooling. The problem occurred whether the vehicle was stationary or moving.

When checking Tesla's service mode, the driver encountered a message indicating that the compressor was inhibited. The owner did not report completing the system's full HVAC diagnostic test.

South Florida's climate made the malfunction especially inconvenient. The owner said interior temperatures ranged from 135 to 160 degrees Fahrenheit when entering the parked vehicle.

Although the Reddit post suggested the repair was unaffordable, the owner later clarified that the headline was intended to attract more responses and recommendations. The driver also confirmed that they purchased a used Model 3.

Owners Suggest Alternatives

Several Reddit users questioned whether the compressor needed replacement at all.

One commenter pointed to a separate Model 3 discussion involving similar symptoms. That conversation suggested a malfunctioning evaporator temperature sensor could interfere with air conditioning operation and potentially cause the evaporator to freeze.

Another owner reported resolving an air conditioning issue in a 2018 Model 3 by replacing a sensor that cost about $20. Others recommended checking for dirty cooling components or obtaining an independent diagnosis before authorizing an expensive repair.

These experiences do not establish that the Florida driver's vehicle has the same fault. A failed compressor, defective sensor, or another HVAC component could produce overlapping symptoms, and the discussion did not include the full diagnostic findings.

Warranty Questions

Tesla's official warranty information states that its Basic Vehicle Limited Warranty covers four years or 50,000 miles, whichever comes first.

At approximately 56,000 miles, the owner's Model 3 had exceeded that mileage limit by roughly 6,000 miles. The vehicle's separate battery and drive unit warranty does not automatically cover an air conditioning repair.

Some Reddit commenters suggested asking Tesla for a goodwill adjustment. One commenter who claimed to have previously worked for Tesla said service managers sometimes approved repairs shortly after warranty expiration. Such assistance would be discretionary rather than guaranteed.

Tesla also offers an Extended Service Agreement subscription for eligible vehicles. Its published U.S. pricing lists Model 3 coverage at $50 per month, subject to eligibility, deductibles, and coverage conditions. Purchasing coverage after a malfunction has already developed should not be assumed to make the existing problem eligible for reimbursement.

Getting Another Diagnosis

For the Florida owner, the immediate decision is whether to authorize Tesla's proposed repair or obtain a second opinion from a shop qualified to service Tesla HVAC systems.

An independent technician could review the existing diagnostic findings, determine whether the compressor has failed, and investigate the less expensive possibilities discussed. Refrigerant work requires appropriate equipment and compliance with federal servicing requirements.

Tesla's published service guidance confirms that owners may use independent repair facilities for work outside warranty coverage.

The owner did not provide a verified final repair outcome in the portions of the discussion reviewed. Their last substantive update confirmed that Tesla had kept the car for approximately 24 hours before increasing the estimate from $1,600 to $4,300.

1. Julian

2. Tanaka Farms and the Irvine Park Railroad

3. Riley’s Farm

4. Southern California Fall Foliage

5. Ghosts and Gravestones Tour

6. The Haunted Trail at Balboa Park

7. Los Angeles Haunted Hayride

8. Night of the Jack

9. Apple Hill

10. Rooftop Cinema Club

A man who was supposed to be shopping for a family vehicle instead put a deposit on a 2018 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat, triggering an angry phone call from his wife to the dealership the following day.

The customer reportedly visited Toronto Auto Brokers with the understanding that he would find a vehicle suitable for his family of five. Rather than purchasing something with family transportation in mind, he selected a high-performance muscle car priced at approximately $58,000 USD.

His wife learned about the decision and contacted the dealership, demanding that the deposit be refunded. She insisted that her husband had been expected to consult her before making a purchase.

The unusual confrontation was documented in a March 25, 2026, video published by Toronto Auto Brokers, which shows dealership representative Gideon attempting to navigate a dispute between two spouses with completely different ideas about their next vehicle.

An Unexpected Phone Call

Embedded media follows; please allow a moment to load.

The confrontation began when the woman called the dealership asking to speak with Gideon, who explained that he wasn't directly involved in vehicle sales.

She told him that her husband had visited the previous day and placed a deposit on a vehicle without discussing the decision with her.

According to the woman, the couple had agreed that he would shop for something capable of accommodating their three children.

Instead, he had committed to a Dodge Challenger costing approximately $80,000 Canadian dollars, equivalent to roughly $58,000 USD at the time.

She questioned whether her husband was experiencing a midlife crisis and complained that the two-door sports car was unsuitable for their family's needs.

Gideon offered to speak with the sales department and explore whether another vehicle might satisfy both spouses. However, the woman demanded a refund of the deposit before discussing any replacement.

She also threatened to change the locks at their home if the situation wasn't resolved.

The Hellcat Purchase

After speaking with his sales team, Gideon discovered that the vehicle was a 2018 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat Widebody.

The Hellcat is considerably different from the practical family vehicle the woman expected. Its supercharged 6.2-liter V8 delivers 707 horsepower in the 2018 model, making performance the vehicle's defining characteristic.

Although the Challenger has five seats, its two-door configuration makes accessing the rear seats less convenient than in a conventional family sedan or SUV.

The salesperson who handled the transaction told Gideon that the customer hadn't mentioned being married or having an agreement with his wife about buying a family vehicle.

Gideon then obtained the customer's phone number and called him directly to discuss the complaint.

Husband Refuses to Back Down

The husband's response was considerably different from his wife's.

He told Gideon that he was making the purchase with his own money and believed he had the right to choose his vehicle without seeking approval.

The man explained that owning a Hellcat had been a longtime dream, and he had no intention of abandoning the purchase because his wife objected.

"I've always dreamed of having this car," he told Gideon.

He also expressed disbelief that his wife had contacted the dealership.

When Gideon asked whether the couple might reconsider the purchase, the customer insisted that he would handle the disagreement personally and that the transaction should proceed.

The dealership representative asked him to provide an update if anything changed, particularly if the couple decided to select another vehicle.

A Dealership Dilemma

The situation left Gideon questioning whether the dealership should proceed with a transaction that had already caused significant conflict within the customer's family.

He acknowledged that the husband was an adult purchasing a vehicle in his own name. At the same time, he expressed concern about contributing to a family dispute over an expensive car.

The disagreement also raised a practical issue for the dealership: the person who placed the deposit wanted to continue with the purchase, while someone who wasn't identified as a party to the transaction demanded that the money be returned.

Whether a dealership must refund a deposit generally depends on the terms of the purchase agreement and applicable consumer protection laws. A spouse's objection alone does not necessarily cancel a transaction.

By the end of the video, the husband remained committed to buying the Hellcat, while his wife had demanded the deposit back.

Gideon said he didn't want a car purchase to disrupt a family and asked viewers what they would do in his position.

The video did not establish whether the customer ultimately completed the purchase, received a refund, or reached an agreement with his wife.

Neighborly disagreements are nothing new, especially when property boundaries and vehicles become part of the conversation. However, one TikTok creator says her ongoing dispute with a neighbor has reached the point where she believes he's deliberately driving over her grass, and viewers are divided over whether she's making too big a deal out of it.

TikTok user @seaairugh57 recently shared a video about her frustrating situation, explaining that the area in question isn't a private driveway but a public alley. According to the creator, her neighbor has been disrespecting her property for some time, and she believes his actions are intentional rather than accidental.

Unfortunately, the disagreement apparently extends well beyond the occasional tire mark in the grass, with the creator describing previous confrontations that have made communication increasingly difficult. She claims the neighbor even accused her and her husband of voyeurism after they installed exterior security cameras, which certainly doesn't sound like the foundation of a particularly friendly relationship.

While the creator believes her neighbor is deliberately causing problems, some viewers have questioned whether damaged grass is worth such a heated dispute. Others, however, think the situation warrants a more permanent solution, with suggestions ranging from installing barriers to building a fence.

Woman Claims Neighbor Is Deliberately Driving Over Her Property

Embedded TikTok video follows; please give it a moment to load completely.

@seaairugh57 Update #2: I’ve posted almost 18-19 minutes of context on the situation with my neighbor on my page. Update: THIS IS NOT A DRIVEWAY. IT IS A PUBLIC ALLEY. We’ve been having issues with this neighbor for a while, and he’s being disrespectful to our property on purpose. Normally, my husband and I would talk to him and ask him to please stop. It has gotten to the point where we cannot have a civil conversation with him. He told a cop that us installing exterior security cameras was voyerism. He also got charged with receiving stolen property because he installed a water meter that was not being monitored and locked himself in his house when the zoning department tried to talk to him about it. The point is: HE IS BEING DISRESPECTFUL ON PURPOSE. #fyp #neighborfromhell #badneighbors ♬ Saxophones getting louder - Sped Up - AntonioVivald

In an update accompanying her TikTok video, the creator emphasized that the disputed area is a public alley rather than a driveway belonging to either household. She also explained that she and her husband would ordinarily approach their neighbor directly, but their relationship has deteriorated to the point where she no longer believes a civil conversation is possible.

"We've been having issues with this neighbor for a while, and he's being disrespectful to our property on purpose," she wrote in the video's description. She also claimed that the neighbor previously faced a receiving-stolen-property charge involving an improperly monitored water meter, although that account has not been independently verified.

The creator says she has uploaded approximately 18 to 19 minutes of additional context explaining the disagreement, suggesting the video represents only part of a much longer neighborhood dispute. However, without confirmation of the property's boundaries or the neighbor's perspective, it's difficult to determine whether the vehicle is actually crossing onto private property or simply using the public alley.

Viewers Are Divided Over Whether the Neighbor's Driving Is Worth the Trouble

Some commenters were convinced the neighbor knew exactly what he was doing, with one viewer writing, "It looks like they're doing it on purpose." Another suggested installing a fence, while someone else recommended using posts or other physical barriers to keep vehicles away from the grass.

However, not everyone believed the situation deserved such a strong reaction, with one commenter writing, "This is so petty it's just grass." Another viewer shared a similar sentiment, saying, "It's just grass," while someone else criticized the lawn's appearance rather than the neighbor's driving.

Other commenters raised concerns about the proposed solutions, including one person who warned that railroad ties could be toxic, while another jokingly suggested scattering nails and screws. Regardless of which side viewers support, the disagreement highlights how quickly a few tire tracks and a strained relationship can turn an ordinary neighborhood alley into a surprisingly contentious piece of real estate.

A neglected 1968 Ferrari 330 became the centerpiece of an emotional family reunion with a treasured automobile when the team at WD Detailing undertook an extensive cleaning of the classic Italian sports car.

The Ferrari belonged to a collector named Joe, who had previously worked with the detailing channel before his death. His granddaughter, Liliana, wanted to see the vehicle brought back to its former appearance as a tribute to the grandfather who helped raise her.

In a video published October 17, 2026, the detailers documented the painstaking process of removing years of accumulated dirt, cleaning delicate original materials, and uncovering valuable accessories inside the car.

Although the team suggested the Ferrari could potentially command as much as $1 million at auction, its sentimental value to Liliana was considerably more important than any potential sale price.

A Family Tribute

Embedded media follows; please allow a moment to load.

The WD Detailing video opens with Liliana describing the relationship she and her sister shared with their grandfather.

Joe had introduced them to automotive culture, taking them to car shows and creating memories that remained important long after his death.

Liliana explained that an earlier WD Detailing project involving another of Joe's Ferraris had renewed his enthusiasm for his collection. Following that experience, he began discussing plans to get more of his cars running again.

The team collected his 1968 Ferrari 330 and transported it to their shop for a comprehensive interior and exterior detail.

Cleaning a Classic

The work began with the Ferrari's distinctive wire wheels, which use knockoff-style center fasteners instead of conventional lug nuts.

Removing them required a specialized lead hammer. The detailers then carefully cleaned and polished the intricate spokes while protecting the lubricated wheel hubs.

Attention turned to the Ferrari's metallic brown exterior. Because the team was uncertain which painted surfaces were original, they avoided an alkaline prewash that could potentially damage sensitive finishes.

After washing the body, they used an iron remover and clay bar to address embedded contamination.

Under the hood sat a roughly 4.0-liter V12 engine producing approximately 300 horsepower when new. Rather than pressure-washing the engine, the crew used steam to remove accumulated grime while limiting water exposure around sensitive components.

Valuable Discoveries

One unexpected discovery came when the detailers inspected the Ferrari's trunk.

They found a vintage tool roll and separate jack equipment. A member of the team estimated that comparable Ferrari tool kits could be advertised for approximately $7,000.

The discovery was particularly interesting because original accessories can be important to the completeness and collector appeal of vintage Ferraris. The video did not establish an independently verified value for the specific kit.

The detailers also discussed the car's unusual metallic brown finish and its potential auction value.

One team member recalled seeing a comparable Ferrari in a similar color sell for more than $800,000 in 2022, although no documentation was presented to establish the value of Joe's particular vehicle.

For perspective, RM Sotheby's sold a 1968 Ferrari 330 GTC for over $523,800 in November 2025. Individual sale prices depend heavily on condition, provenance, originality, and specification.

Inside the Ferrari

Cleaning the cabin presented another challenge.

The center console contained mold and mildew, requiring protective equipment and careful treatment. Elsewhere, the crew encountered aging carpets, delicate trim, and a distinctive padded headliner.

Removing the seat covers revealed a welcome surprise. Instead of the badly deteriorated upholstery the detailers had anticipated, the black leather underneath remained in remarkably good condition.

The team cleaned and conditioned the seats, treated the interior surfaces, and carefully extracted dirt from the vintage carpeting.

During the final exterior polishing, the crew noticed texture indicating that at least part of the Ferrari's paint had been refinished previously.

Rather than aggressively sanding the finish, they concentrated on reducing light scratches and oxidation while preserving the existing paint.

An Emotional Reveal

When the finished Ferrari was returned, Liliana admitted she felt nervous and excited about seeing her grandfather's car again.

As the garage door opened, she immediately admired the transformation. The polished brown paint, refreshed interior, and gleaming chrome gave the vehicle an appearance dramatically different from its neglected condition.

The reveal became particularly emotional when she imagined how Joe would have reacted.

"I think he would use the words, 'It's marvelous,'" Liliana said.

The detailers also suggested giving the Ferrari a name. One proposed Apollonia, inspired by a character from The Godfather, while the conversation turned to Josephine or Josie, names with connections to Liliana's family.

Before the video ended, Liliana encouraged other automotive enthusiasts to share their passion with family members, recalling the experiences she and her sister enjoyed with their grandfather.

She explained that Joe never retired from the family business and had wanted to see his collection receive more attention.

For Liliana, seeing the Ferrari cleaned represented another opportunity to preserve those memories and honor the enthusiasm for cars that her grandfather passed down to his family.

An 18-year-old Nevada driver faces monthly insurance payments of $814.31 on a 1992 Ford F-150, despite claiming a clean driving record and carrying only the state's minimum required liability coverage.

The driver shared a screenshot of the payment schedule on Reddit, showing five upcoming payments between November 2026 and March 2027. At that rate, a full year of insurance would cost approximately $9,772.

The driver said they had already paid a little over $300 for their first month of coverage. However, they plan to move to another state before the November 1 payment comes due and arrange different insurance coverage.

The price is particularly striking given the truck's age. The owner joked that the 34-year-old Ford was worth little more than a cheeseburger without pickles, yet a single monthly insurance bill could represent a substantial portion of the vehicle's value.

Expensive Basic Coverage

My insurance on a 34 year old car at 18
by
u/Firedrgn0717 in
mildlyinfuriating

The driver identified Progressive as the insurer and said the truck is owned outright, with no remaining payments. They also claimed they had never received a traffic ticket, been in a crash, or even been pulled over by police.

In response to questions about their insurance history, the driver said they had carried Liberty Mutual coverage for about two months before canceling the policy. They also reported having little or no credit history.

The driver said they contacted Progressive about pricing but did not receive a helpful explanation. Their immediate concern was securing coverage and registering the truck before traveling more than 1,000 miles to another state.

Why Insurance Costs More

A vehicle's market value is only one consideration when determining insurance premiums. Even an inexpensive pickup can be costly to insure because liability coverage pays for injuries and damage to other people, not repairs to the policyholder's vehicle.

According to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, insurers evaluate factors including age, driving experience, location, credit history, previous insurance coverage, and the type of vehicle being insured.

A driver with no traffic violations can still face expensive premiums because they have limited driving experience. A previous policy cancellation and limited credit history may also influence pricing, depending on the circumstances and applicable state regulations.

Nevada requires minimum liability limits of $25,000 for bodily injury to one person, $50,000 for injuries to multiple people, and $20,000 for property damage in a single crash.

Those minimum limits do not cover damage to the insured driver's own truck.

Looking For Alternatives

The Reddit discussion prompted questions about whether the truck could qualify for classic-vehicle insurance, but the owner said they drive too frequently for that arrangement.

Other commenters questioned the unusually high premium and suggested comparing quotes from additional insurance providers.

The screenshot shows the scheduled amounts and dates, but it doesn't explain how Progressive calculated the premium. The driver's personal insurance details and reported clean record have not been independently verified.

It remains unclear whether moving to another state will result in a more affordable insurance policy.

A Pennsylvania car owner faced an unexpected $1,800 repair bill after a dealership repeatedly delayed replacing a faulty air-conditioning compressor until months after the vehicle's warranty expired. The dispute ended when the dealership admitted its mistake and canceled the charge.

The woman's husband described the experience in a July 3, 2026, Reddit post on r/legaladvice. He said his wife brought the vehicle in for an inspection in June 2025 and reported that the air conditioning wasn't working properly.

The dealership diagnosed a compressor problem while the vehicle was still covered by warranty. However, employees reportedly said the replacement part was unavailable and would need to be ordered. The woman was told the repair could be completed when she returned for an oil change approximately six weeks later.

That replacement never happened as promised. By the time the dealership finally installed the compressor in July 2026, the warranty had expired, and the family was being asked to pay for work they believed should have been covered.

Repeated Repair Delays

Dealership Slow Rolled Repair Until Warranty Expired
by
u/Eisernes in
legaladvice

When the woman returned for her scheduled oil change in August 2025, the dealership reportedly acknowledged that it had never ordered the compressor.

Employees again promised to obtain the replacement and contact her when it arrived. According to her husband, they did not follow up before the vehicle's warranty expired in October 2025.

On July 2, 2026, the woman returned for another annual inspection. This time, the dealership had the compressor available and replaced it.

Her husband claimed employees never explained that the repair would no longer be covered by warranty. He also said the dealership performed the work without first providing an estimate for the $1,800 charge.

The dealership subsequently presented the bill, creating a dispute over payment and the vehicle's release.

Dealership Faces Pushback

The husband accused the dealership of deliberately delaying the work until the warranty expired, although the Reddit account provides no independent evidence that the delays were intentional.

He said employees began reviewing previous phone recordings and service records after the family challenged the invoice. The dealership also reportedly offered to reduce the bill, but he maintained that his wife should not owe anything.

The situation became more frustrating when employees allegedly suggested trading the vehicle toward a newer model while the billing dispute remained unresolved.

Reddit commenters encouraged the family to obtain documentation showing when the compressor problem was diagnosed. Others recommended escalating the complaint to the dealership's general manager or the vehicle manufacturer rather than immediately hiring an attorney.

What Warranty Rules Say

The dispute highlights an important distinction between when a mechanical problem is reported and when the dealership completes the repair.

According to the Federal Trade Commission's consumer warranty guidance, a company must correct a covered defect reported during the warranty period if it wasn't properly resolved before coverage expired.

However, the exact circumstances still matter. Vehicle owners should review their warranty agreements and preserve repair orders, diagnostic reports, appointment confirmations, and communications documenting the original complaint.

The FTC also recommends contacting the manufacturer when a seller cannot resolve a warranty disagreement. Consumers can report unresolved problems to the FTC or their state attorney general.

Dealership Cancels Bill

The family ultimately got the outcome they were seeking.

In a July 9 update to the original Reddit discussion, the husband reported that the dealership acknowledged its mistake and eliminated the entire $1,800 charge.

He explained that the dealership retained message logs and recorded phone calls that documented earlier communications and promises about the repair.

The husband credited the business for eventually correcting the situation rather than continuing to demand payment.

The post did not identify the dealership or vehicle manufacturer, and its account has not been independently verified. Nevertheless, the reported resolution illustrates how retained service records can help settle disputes involving repairs first requested while a vehicle was still under warranty.

A Carvana customer bought a Ford F-150 with a daytime running light that didn't work, but everything else seemed fine... at first. The delivery driver pointed out the light and said the warranty would cover the repair, so the buyer decided to keep the truck, thinking it wouldn't be a big issue.

The F-150 had been shipped from Oklahoma in early September. In a Reddit post, the buyer explained that they'd picked this particular truck because it had everything they wanted.

About a week after getting the truck, the buyer took it to a mechanic to have the running light fixed. The mechanic found an electrical short, which is a more extensive repair than the buyer originally thought.

The F-150 eventually went to a Ford dealership, where it's been sitting for more than a month. Technicians have tried replacing various parts, but they still haven't been able to get the light working properly.

Ford Replaces Three Parts Without Fixing F-150's Light

Embedded media follows. Please allow a moment for it to load.

My buying experience this far...
by
u/Wildpotatoes in
CarvanaComplaints

The buyer said Ford replaced the headlight assembly, the module that goes with it, and the body control module. None of that fixed the electrical problem.

One person on Reddit suggested replacing the body control module first, then checking the wiring harness if that didn't resolve the issue. The buyer replied that Ford had already done that and was testing the wires to find the short.

The dealership also told the buyer it was bringing in a senior Ford technician to help. There wasn't any estimate for when the F-150 would be ready. Then the buyer got another call from Ford. This time, they were told it could take several more weeks to figure out what was wrong.

Carvana Offers 10 Days of Rental Car Reimbursement

After hearing that news, the buyer called Carvana to see what could be done about the truck. They'd already been without it for more than a month and weren't getting anywhere with the repairs.

According to the buyer, Carvana said the seven-day return period had passed. The representative offered to reimburse them for a 10-day rental car, but couldn't authorize anything beyond that.

Carvana's official policy allows customers to return a vehicle within seven days of delivery. The company also includes a limited warranty for 100 days or 4,189 miles. The buyer had taken the truck in for service shortly after delivery, but the light was still broken long after the return period ended.

SilverRock Won't Approve Moving the Truck

The buyer also tried getting SilverRock, Carvana's warranty administrator, to approve moving the F-150 to another Ford dealership. They wanted someone else to look into the electrical problem.

SilverRock wouldn't allow it, according to the buyer. They were told the current dealership would have to say it couldn't fix the truck or didn't want to work on it anymore. Some Reddit users suggested pushing Carvana to take the F-150 back. Others thought the Ford dealership should have been able to track down the electrical short by now.

The buyer said Carvana had previously told them to get back in touch if Ford couldn't repair the truck. They might be willing to work something out, but the buyer hasn't reported any agreement.

Porsche has unveiled the Mission S, a striking new concept that previews the future of the brand's sports cars. With dramatic proportions, a mid-engined layout, and an interior that prioritizes driving over touchscreen technology, it looks like exactly the kind of machine enthusiasts have been asking for.

The Mission S also signals something significant for Porsche's future lineup. The German automaker is developing a new supercar platform positioned above the 911, creating a permanent addition to its range rather than another limited-production hypercar.

Unveiled in New York on October 15, the concept introduces a fresh design direction under Porsche's new styling chief, Tobias Sühlmann. Its appearance draws inspiration from several legendary models, including the 911 GT1, 959, 917, and 550 Spyder.

Perhaps most excitingly, Porsche is developing the new supercar platform with combustion engines in mind. Both conventional gasoline and hybrid powertrains are under consideration, although specific engine details and performance figures haven't been announced.

A Modern Porsche With Classic Supercar Proportions

The Mission S combines a low nose, muscular fenders, and flowing bodywork with a distinctly mid-engined silhouette. Its rounded headlights recall classic Porsches, while the wide rear end incorporates an active wing and prominent aerodynamic elements.

Look closely, and you'll find references to Porsche's racing heritage throughout the design. A visible cooling fan recalls the legendary 917, while the wheels take inspiration from the distinctive dial-style design of the 928.

Finally, A Supercar Without A Giant Touchscreen

The interior might be the Mission S's most appealing feature. Instead of filling the dashboard with enormous displays, Porsche has embraced physical switches, traditional instruments, and a cockpit designed around the driver.

Five circular gauges sit behind the steering wheel, with a central tachometer featuring an analog needle. The instruments can physically reposition themselves depending on the selected driving mode, bringing essential information closer to the driver's attention.

There's no permanently installed central infotainment screen, either. A retractable MagSafe-compatible smartphone holder provides navigation and other digital functions when needed, leaving the dashboard refreshingly uncluttered.

Porsche Is Planning Something Bigger Than The 911

Unlike the Carrera GT and 918 Spyder, Porsche's next flagship isn't intended to be a limited-production halo car. CEO Michael Leiters envisions a permanent supercar offering that can accommodate different powertrains and evolve over time.

Porsche has yet to reveal which engine will power the production model, although the platform's flexibility leaves several possibilities open. The company also hasn't provided a launch date or indicated how much its new flagship might cost.

If the finished car preserves the Mission S's striking design and driver-focused philosophy, it could become one of the most appealing additions to Porsche's lineup in years. Enthusiasts will certainly be hoping that the production version stays true to the concept's old-school priorities.

When an automaker tells owners to park outside because of a fire risk, electric vehicles often come to mind. However, Hyundai's latest recall involves gasoline-powered luxury sedans, and the problem has nothing to do with their engines or batteries.

According to documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Hyundai is recalling 94,622 vehicles because of a potentially dangerous defect involving their power-adjustable front seats. A damaged seat adjustment switch could cause a motor to overheat and potentially start a fire.

The recall covers certain 2015–2016 Hyundai Genesis sedans and 2017–2020 Genesis G80 models. Owners are being instructed to park outside and away from buildings and other vehicles until repairs are completed.

Unfortunately, Hyundai hasn't finalized a solution yet, so affected owners may have to wait before getting their cars fixed. The automaker estimates that approximately 1% of the recalled vehicles are affected by the defect.

A Power Seat Switch Could Start A Fire

The problem involves the forward/backward and height adjustment controls on front power seats without a memory function. An external impact could damage or dislodge the switch mechanism, potentially leaving it stuck in the activated position.

If that happens, the seat adjustment motor could continue running even after reaching the end of its travel. Prolonged operation can cause overheating, increasing the risk of a fire whether the vehicle is parked or being driven.

Both driver-side and passenger-side controls may be affected. Vehicles equipped with memory seats are not included in this particular recall.

Nearly 95,000 Vehicles Are Affected

The recall includes 54,644 Hyundai Genesis sedans and 39,978 Genesis G80s, bringing the total to 94,622 vehicles. Despite the relatively small percentage expected to have the defect, Hyundai is taking precautions across the affected population.

Owners may notice that their power seat controls no longer work properly. A burning smell coming from the seat area is another potential warning sign.

Hyundai Is Still Working On A Fix

Hyundai is developing a permanent remedy, which will be performed free of charge at authorized dealerships once available. Until then, affected owners should continue parking outside, away from structures and other vehicles.

Owner notification letters are scheduled for December 6, 2026. Drivers can check whether their vehicle is affected through the NHTSA recall website using their VIN and recall number 26V664. 

Ferrari built just 349 examples of the F50, making it one of the rarest and most sought-after supercars to emerge from Maranello. Nearly three decades after production ended, collectors are paying extraordinary sums to get their hands on one.

Now, a particularly special 1997 example is preparing to cross the auction block in Las Vegas on October 31, 2026. Offered by Broad Arrow Auctions, this F50 has a remarkable history and a price expectation that could make it the most expensive example ever sold at public auction.

Its appeal doesn't come from celebrity ownership or an unusual factory specification. What sets this F50 apart is how well it has survived nearly three decades.

This Ferrari is among the final F50s produced and has spent much of its life in private collections. Its condition is the real attraction, offering a rare glimpse of what one of Ferrari's greatest analog supercars looked like when it was new.

A Nearly Brand-New Ferrari From 1997

Finished in Rosso Corsa with Nero leather upholstery and red seat inserts, this F50 was originally delivered through Maranello Sales in Surrey, England. It was one of around 25 examples supplied new to the United Kingdom.

The car subsequently spent time in collections in Japan and Europe before arriving in the United States for auction. According to Broad Arrow, its paintwork, interior, and controls show virtually none of the wear normally associated with a 29-year-old supercar.

It also retains its removable hardtop, original flight case, three-piece Schedoni luggage set, and J.P. Tod's driving shoes. The accompanying accessories even include factory tools, spare components, and protective covers.

Formula 1 Engineering With A Manual Gearbox

Underneath its sculpted bodywork sits a naturally aspirated 4.7-liter V12 derived from Ferrari's Formula 1 engine technology. Producing 513 horsepower and 347 lb-ft of torque, it sends power to the rear wheels through a six-speed gated manual transmission.

The F50 also features a carbon-fiber monocoque and an engine that serves as a structural component of the chassis. Ferrari quoted a top speed of 202 mph, while contemporary testing recorded a 0–60 mph time of 3.6 seconds.

Could This Become The Most Expensive F50 Ever?

F50 values have climbed dramatically in recent years, with a yellow example selling for $14.575 million in August 2026 currently standing as the model's public auction record.

Broad Arrow expects this 106-mile example to exceed $20 million, potentially setting a substantially higher benchmark. The Ferrari has also recently undergone servicing and a Ferrari Classiche inspection at Ferrari of Newport Beach.

Whether collectors will pay such an extraordinary premium for its preserved condition will be decided when bidding begins. One thing is certain, though, whoever buys it will face a difficult decision about whether to actually drive it.

A semi-truck hauling a load of French fries caught fire along a Utah highway, prompting a quick response from local first responders and leaving authorities with one particularly unfortunate casualty: a trailer full of fries.

According to a local news update from Emery County Sheriff Tyson Huntington, the Emery County Sheriff's Office (ECSO) Dispatch Center received a call around 8 p.m. on Saturday, October 10, 2026, reporting a semi-truck on fire near mile marker 293 on State Route 6.

Dispatch contacted Green River Fire and notified the on-duty ECSO deputy in Green River. However, responders soon learned that this was no ordinary truck fire. The burning trailer was hauling French fries.

The Sheriff's Office Facebook post added a humorous twist, joking that while the situation might have tempted some people to stop at home for ketchup or fry sauce, Deputy Josh Opp had more pressing matters to attend to. Instead of making an emergency condiment run, Opp headed straight to the scene to help tackle the unusual roadside emergency.

Deputy Opp and the Green River Fire Department arrived quickly and extinguished the blaze before things could get even more heated.

French Fries Were on the Menu, but Not Like This

The unusual cargo gave the incident a humorous twist, even as first responders worked to bring the fire under control. A trailer full of French fries catching fire is certainly an unexpected headline, although the situation could have been much worse.

Green River Fire Chief Steph Crabtree told officials that the fire may have started because of a problem with one of the trailer's axles. The cause has not been officially confirmed. 

Fortunately, the truck driver was able to disconnect the tractor from the burning trailer, saving the truck itself from the fire. And while losing a trailer full of French fries is enough to ruin anyone's day, there was some genuinely good news: no one was injured.

Sheriff Thanks First Responders After Fire

Huntington expressed his gratitude to the Green River first responders for their quick action, which helped bring the incident under control.

The sheriff's account also struck a lighthearted note about the unusual cargo, joking that it was always sad to lose French fries. It's an understandable sentiment.

Although the fire was no laughing matter for the first responders, the unusual circumstances made for an unconventional local news story in Utah. Thankfully, and most importantly, the driver suffered no injuries, the tractor was saved, and first responders quickly brought the blaze under control.

As for the fries? Their final destination remains unclear, but one thing is certain: this shipment wasn't going to make it to potential dinner tables.

At 96 years old, legendary Polish rally driver Sobiesław Zasada, also known as the 'Flying Pole', hasn't lost his passion for motorsport. Nearly six decades after winning one of Argentina's toughest rallies, he's returned to the country to revisit the scene of his famous victory.

Porsche helped organize the special reunion, bringing Zasada back for the 2026 Gran Premio Argentino Histórico. This time, however, he wasn't competing for victory behind the wheel.

Instead, the three-time European rally champion participated as a co-driver in a Porsche 911 Dakar wearing a special tribute livery. The car recreated the appearance of the red 911 that carried him to victory in 1967, complete with its original racing number, 405.

The occasion also brought Zasada face-to-face with a replica of his beloved original Porsche, affectionately nicknamed "Porschito." For a driver whose career has spanned decades and continents, it was a particularly memorable homecoming.

The Porsche Victory That Made History

In October 1967, Zasada entered Argentina's Gran Premio Internacional de Turismo, a demanding rally covering over 3,000 kilometers (1,864 miles). The route crossed mountains, deserts, and flooded plains, testing nearly 400 competitors.

Driving his red Porsche 911 alongside co-driver Jerzy Dobrzański, Zasada defeated a field that included factory-backed teams. Their car featured an intercom system that had never previously been used in an Argentinian competition, giving the pair a valuable communication advantage.

Zasada secured both the overall victory and first place in Class C, and the achievement became an important milestone in Porsche's international rallying history.

A Remarkable Career That Spanned Five Continents

Born in Poland in 1930, Zasada initially pursued athletics before a shoulder injury ended his Olympic javelin ambitions. He turned to motorsport in 1952 and went on to become Poland's most decorated rally driver.

His career includes three European rally championships, eight Polish national titles, and an extraordinary 148 rally victories. According to Porsche, he competed in more than 40 countries and covered nearly three million kilometers (1.86 million miles).

Still Eager To Race At 96

For his return to Argentina, Porsche prepared a 911 Dakar inspired by the original Porschito, complete with its distinctive number 405. A replica of the 1967 car was also presented during the celebrations.

While he participated as a co-driver this time, Zasada said his competitive instincts haven't disappeared. Reflecting on his historic victory, he offered a statement that perfectly captured his enduring enthusiasm.

"The race took place 59 years ago," Zasada said, "and if today it were exactly as it was at that moment, I would race it again, even at my current 96 years of age."

Toyota believes internal-combustion engines still have a future in Europe, even as the continent moves toward stricter emissions regulations. The Japanese automaker is now urging European lawmakers to recognize certain combustion-powered vehicles as zero-emission cars.

However, Toyota isn't suggesting that ordinary gasoline vehicles should receive the same classification as electric cars. Instead, it wants vehicles designed to run exclusively on qualifying renewable fuels to be treated as zero-emission.

The proposal forms part of Toyota's latest recommendations for Europe's automotive regulations, announced on October 16. The company argues that policymakers should adopt a more flexible approach to reducing emissions while protecting the region's automotive industry.

Toyota's position comes as European regulators reconsider the rules governing new vehicles from 2035 onward. The automaker believes renewable fuels could help preserve internal-combustion technology while supporting Europe's climate ambitions.

Toyota Wants Renewable-Fuel Cars Recognized As Zero-Emission

Toyota is asking the European Union to create a common definition for vehicles exclusively running on eligible renewable fuels, known as VEEF. Under its proposal, these vehicles would receive zero-emission status despite retaining internal-combustion engines.

The company wants the classification aligned with the EU's Renewable Energy Directive, establishing consistent standards for qualifying fuels. Crucially, the proposal wouldn't automatically cover conventional gasoline cars that occasionally use renewable fuel.

However, burning renewable fuels still produces tailpipe CO2, meaning the proposed classification would reflect their potential lifecycle emissions benefits rather than an absence of exhaust emissions.

Europe Could Give Combustion Engines More Breathing Room

Toyota is also pushing for a 90% reduction in fleet-average CO2 emissions for new vehicles by 2035, instead of the 100% reduction required under the EU's existing rules. It believes renewable fuels and measures such as low-carbon steel could help address the remaining emissions.

The automaker is requesting additional flexibility around the 2030 targets, including a five-year compliance window running from 2028 through 2032. Toyota argues that regulations must better reflect actual electric vehicle demand and infrastructure development.

There's Still A Major Problem To Solve

One obvious challenge is ensuring that vehicles classified as renewable-fuel-only actually use qualifying fuels throughout their lives. Without reliable verification, drivers could potentially fill their tanks with conventional gasoline.

Toyota has already been exploring a possible solution through a Spanish pilot program launched with BMW, Bosch, and Repsol. The trial uses digital tracking technology to verify renewable-fuel use across approximately 20 vehicles.

Toyota's proposal could give combustion engines a longer future in Europe, although regulators would need to establish strict rules governing which fuels qualify. The debate also raises questions about whether Europe's emissions regulations should focus solely on vehicle exhaust or take into account the environmental impact of the fuels they use.

Tesla's new Roadster promises to be one of the most outrageous performance cars ever conceived. With cold-gas thrusters, active aerodynamics, and even the ability to potentially fly, it's unlike anything the company has attempted before.

Following the car's unveiling, Hagerty's Henry Catchpole sat down with Tesla's vice president of vehicle engineering, Lars Moravy, to discuss the technology behind the long-awaited sports car. Their conversation revealed some surprising engineering decisions and extraordinary performance targets.

Perhaps the biggest surprise is that the Roadster is rear-wheel drive rather than all-wheel drive. Moravy explained that two rear-mounted electric motors produce over 1,341 horsepower and 1,033 lb-ft of torque, exceeding the combined output of the Model S Plaid's three motors.

The company is initially planning three versions, each with increasingly extreme capabilities. Moravy also explained how technology from Tesla's Optimus robot program and SpaceX has found its way into the car.

Over 1,300 Horsepower Through The Rear Wheels

Moravy told Catchpole that Tesla developed specialized 4680 battery cells with aluminum casings and double-sided cooling to improve thermal performance. The company is targeting a weight below 1,700 kilograms (3,748 pounds), despite the Roadster's sophisticated hardware.

Moravy also discussed the Roadster's rapid charging capabilities, with the company targeting a 15–80% charge in approximately 10 minutes. The car is also expected to offer over 300 miles of range.

Fans, Moving Panels, And Robot Technology

The Performance version features four powerful fans and retractable skirts that generate suction beneath the car, improving traction at low speeds. This model is expected to reach 60 mph in 1.6 seconds and achieve a top speed of 210 mph.

Moravy also demonstrated the Roadster's movable aerodynamic panels and active rear wing. Interestingly, he revealed that the wing uses actuators originally developed for Tesla's Optimus humanoid robot.

SpaceX Thrusters Take Things Further

Moravy explained that the Thrust version adds four rear-mounted cold-gas thrusters supplied by a 200-liter tank of compressed nitrogen. Tesla claims these can help propel the car from 0 to 60 mph in just 0.85 seconds, with a top speed of 230 mph.

The flagship Rocket version adds another 400-liter nitrogen tank in place of the passenger seat, along with six additional thrusters. Moravy revealed that this configuration is designed to accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in just 0.55 seconds, using a rollout-adjusted measurement.

More remarkably, Moravy explained that the additional thrusters are intended to let the Roadster lift off the ground and perform aerial maneuvers. He confirmed that Tesla worked with SpaceX to develop the propulsion system.

Will Tesla Actually Build It?

The redesigned Roadster now features two seats instead of the originally proposed 2+2 layout, while the Rocket version accommodates only the driver. Other features include removable roof panels, steer-by-wire controls, and a driver-focused cockpit.

Moravy told Catchpole that Tesla has several development prototypes, with a larger build phase planned for early 2027. Pricing and a firm production date are still unconfirmed, while the extraordinary acceleration and flight capabilities have yet to be independently verified.

Flock Safety's controversial license plate recognition cameras have become a growing concern for those worried about privacy and surveillance. Despite multiple reports of police officers misusing the technology, the company says it has never terminated a law enforcement customer over abuse of its systems.

That admission came from Flock CEO Garrett Langley during an interview at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 in San Francisco. He insisted the company would cut ties with customers who knowingly broke the law, although that hasn't happened yet.

Flock operates a network of more than 100,000 cameras across the United States, capturing license plate information as vehicles pass by. Police departments can use the resulting data to investigate crimes and track vehicles, sometimes across jurisdictional boundaries.

However, the technology has attracted criticism following cases involving officers using the system to stalk people or conduct unauthorized searches. Those incidents have raised questions about whether Flock and its customers are doing enough to prevent misuse.

Flock Says Misconduct Could Cost Police Departments Their Access

"If a customer knowingly broke the law, we would fire them immediately. That's very easy," Langley told TechCrunch.

However, he acknowledged that the company has never actually terminated a customer for abusing its products. He suggested the decision becomes complicated when misconduct involves only a handful of officers within a larger department.

"Most of the debate is nuanced into 'what if two officers out of fifty were caught?'" Langley explained. He argued that terminating an entire department's access could deprive a community of technology used to investigate crimes.

Flock maintains that its cameras help law enforcement recover stolen vehicles, locate missing people, and solve serious crimes. Langley cited an incident involving a stolen vehicle with a baby inside as an example of the system's potential benefits.

Police Misuse Has Raised Serious Questions

Several officers across the country have faced disciplinary action or criminal allegations after reportedly using license plate databases for personal purposes. Some cases have involved tracking former partners or other individuals without legitimate investigative reasons.

Critics argue that the problem extends beyond individual officers to how departments supervise access to sensitive vehicle-location information. The ability to search records across a large camera network makes effective oversight particularly important.

The controversy has prompted some communities to cancel Flock contracts or allow them to expire. Others have questioned whether the public-safety benefits outweigh the privacy risks associated with widespread vehicle tracking.

Flock Faces Growing Public Backlash

Protesters gathered outside the TechCrunch conference while Langley was speaking, criticizing the company's surveillance technology. Demonstrators called for greater accountability and stronger restrictions on how license plate data is collected and accessed.

Langley defended Flock's role in helping police investigate crimes and said the company has no plans to sell itself to rival surveillance technology provider Axon. Still, his comments leave a significant question unanswered.

If Flock is willing to terminate customers for serious misuse, what exactly would it take for the company to act? With no police departments dropped so far, critics are likely to keep asking where Flock draws that line.

A woman in her 60s died after her own vehicle rolled backward and struck her in a Chick-fil-A parking lot in Moore, Oklahoma, on Thursday, October 15.

The woman had exited her vehicle without putting it in park, according to the Moore Police Department. The vehicle began rolling backward, knocking her down before striking her.

Moore police officers responded to the restaurant near Southwest 19th Street and Telephone Road around 6 p.m. The woman suffered serious injuries and was transported to a local hospital.

The department initially reported the incident as an auto-pedestrian crash. On Friday, October 16, police updated their public statement to confirm that the woman had died.

Police Confirm Death

Embedded media follows; please allow a moment to load.

In its Facebook statement, the Moore Police Department explained what caused the vehicle to move.

"At the time of the incident, the vehicle was not in park when the driver exited," police wrote. "The vehicle began rolling backward, knocking the woman down and striking her."

The department also expressed its condolences to the woman's family and loved ones.

The original traffic alert identified the Chick-fil-A as the location of the incident but did not provide details about how the woman was struck. Those circumstances became clearer after police released their update.

Investigation Continues

Speaking with KOCO 5 News, Moore Police Department public information officer Clint Byley described the incident as an apparent accident.

Byley confirmed that the vehicle began moving after the woman stepped outside, leaving her in its path.

Police had not determined why she exited the vehicle or disclosed whether she attempted to stop it as it rolled backward.

"This is just a really sad accident," Byley told KOCO, adding that the department's thoughts and condolences were with the woman's family.

The crash remained under investigation as of the October 16 report. Police had not identified any suspected mechanical malfunction or disclosed the vehicle's make and model.

Preventing Vehicle Rollaways

The circumstances highlight a serious parking safety risk that can occur even when a vehicle appears to be stationary.

A vehicle left in drive or neutral can begin moving unexpectedly when the driver releases the brake. Depending on its position and the surrounding terrain, it may roll forward or backward without anyone operating the controls.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration provides vehicle safety information, including recalls involving unintended vehicle movement and rollaway risks.

Drivers should ensure their transmission is securely in park and engage the parking brake before leaving a vehicle. Confirming that the vehicle is stationary before opening the door provides another opportunity to identify a potential problem.

These are general safety precautions. Moore police have not reported that a vehicle defect or parking lot incline contributed to this incident.

The woman's name had not been released as of Friday's police update. Byley told KOCO that police were withholding her identity until her family had been notified.

A woman hoping to sell an inherited Ferrari was in for an unexpected surprise when a dealership discovered that her Italian sports car was actually an American-made Pontiac disguised as one.

The vehicle arrived at Toronto Auto Brokers after employee Jacob arranged its purchase from an elderly woman who believed she owned a 1985 Ferrari 308. However, an inspection quickly raised questions about what had been delivered.

The woman, identified as Elizabeth, had inherited the vehicle from her uncle and kept it in her garage for 12 years without driving it. She believed she owned a genuine Ferrari and hoped its sale would provide a financial windfall.

Instead, dealership employee Gideon discovered that the car was a replica built on a 1982 Pontiac Trans Am. The unusual discovery was documented in a YouTube video published by Toronto Auto Brokers on September 17, 2026, showing how the dealership handled the uncomfortable situation.

A Suspicious Ferrari

Embedded media follows; please allow a moment to load.

Jacob had been working with Elizabeth for several weeks to arrange the sale. However, the dealership had not received photographs or identifying documentation before collecting the vehicle from her home.

When Gideon went outside to inspect what he expected to be a classic Ferrari, several details immediately appeared inconsistent with the Italian manufacturer's sports cars.

The vehicle had removable T-top roof panels, unusual interior components, and bodywork that reminded dealership employees of an American muscle car. Gideon also struggled to locate identifying information that would clarify its origins.

After examining the vehicle with his colleagues, he concluded it was not a Ferrari.

"This is not a Ferrari. This is a kit car," he explained.

Gideon said that in 25 years in the automotive business, he had never encountered a situation where a vehicle arrived and turned out to be something completely different from what was expected.

Owner Learns Truth

Gideon contacted Elizabeth directly to explain the discovery and ask about the vehicle's history.

She confirmed that it had been sitting in her garage for 12 years and that she had never driven it. When Gideon informed her that the car was not a genuine Ferrari, she expressed disbelief.

"Oh, I was sure it's Ferrari. Are you sure?" she asked.

Gideon explained that the vehicle was an American car modified to resemble a Ferrari. Elizabeth also confirmed that she did not have the ownership paperwork readily available.

The revelation created an uncomfortable situation for both parties. Elizabeth had expected the vehicle to be valuable, while the dealership needed to determine what the replica was actually worth.

She still wanted to sell it, asking Gideon to offer as much as possible despite the unexpected news.

Pontiac Underneath

Over the following days, the dealership conducted additional research and consulted someone knowledgeable about replica vehicles. The underlying car was ultimately identified as a 1982 Pontiac Trans Am.

The identification helped explain several unusual features, including the T-top roof and American-style interior components.

Ferrari-inspired replicas built from American donor vehicles are a longstanding part of automotive customization. Their value depends on the donor vehicle, conversion quality, mechanical condition, and available documentation.

In this case, the replica's mechanical condition remained an additional consideration because it had reportedly sat unused for more than a decade.

Gideon initially admitted that he could not confidently estimate its value, mentioning possibilities ranging from $5,000 to $20,000 without committing to an appraisal.

Those figures were speculative, not confirmed offers or a final selling price.

Deal Finally Closes

Despite the disappointing discovery, Toronto Auto Brokers ultimately purchased the vehicle.

Gideon explained that the dealership had never promised Elizabeth a specific amount before identifying the car. However, she had developed her own expectations about what an inherited Ferrari might be worth.

When the dealership determined that the vehicle was a Pontiac-based replica, those expectations changed considerably.

"She wasn't happy with what she got for the car," Gideon acknowledged, adding that she understood the situation.

The final purchase price was not disclosed.

Elizabeth needed the garage space, and the vehicle had remained unused for years. Those circumstances contributed to her decision to complete the sale despite receiving less than she had hoped.

The dealership ultimately acquired a Ferrari-inspired Pontiac rather than the classic Italian sports car it originally expected.

Doug DeMuro is parting ways with one of the most recognizable cars in his collection. The automotive YouTuber and Cars & Bids founder has listed his 2005 Ford GT for auction, giving enthusiasts an opportunity to own a supercar with a well-documented history.

Unlike many Ford GTs that spend most of their lives sitting in garages, DeMuro's example has been driven regularly. Its odometer currently shows approximately 45,800 miles, including around 14,400 miles accumulated during his ownership.

The car is being offered through DeMuro's own Cars & Bids platform, with no reserve price. That means the highest bidder will take it home regardless of the final amount.

Bidding had reached $506,000 at the time of writing, with the auction scheduled to end today, on October 17, 2026. DeMuro plans to replace the car with a Ford GT Heritage Edition.

A Ford GT That Was Actually Driven

Finished in Midnight Blue Metallic with an Ebony interior, this GT is equipped with optional BBS forged wheels, painted brake calipers, and racing stripes. According to the listing, it has had just two owners since leaving the factory.

DeMuro purchased the car in September 2018, having deliberately sought an example he could enjoy without worrying excessively about adding mileage. The result is a supercar that has accumulated plenty of road time rather than being preserved exclusively for display.

Supercharged V8 Power And A Six-Speed Manual

The 2005 Ford GT features a mid-mounted 5.4-liter supercharged V8 producing 550 horsepower and 500 lb-ft of torque in factory spec, which is routed to the rear wheels through a six-speed manual transmission.

DeMuro's car has received several modifications, including a smaller supercharger pulley, an ECU tune, a Ford Racing exhaust, and a short shifter. These changes may increase engine output, although no dynamometer results have been provided. The car also features an Alpine stereo and a signature from original Ford GT designer Camilo Pardo in the engine bay.

An Unusually Detailed Ownership History

One of this GT's strongest selling points is its extensive documentation. The auction includes the original build book, window stickers, factory literature, service records, and even a logbook documenting every fuel stop between 2005 and 2018.

Several original components are included, allowing the next owner to reverse certain modifications if desired. The listing also discloses paint chips, interior wear, and clearcoat damage on one wheel.

Those imperfections reflect a car that has actually been enjoyed over two decades. Its final selling price should offer an interesting indication of how collectors value a regularly driven Ford GT with a famous owner.

A Carvana customer bought a 2022 Tesla Model 3 with a few scratches and an interior that needed cleaning. Unfortunately, the bigger problems weren't visible until a mechanic got a look underneath the car.

The buyer posted a photo of the damage on Reddit after having the Tesla checked at another shop. Looking at it from the outside, they said nothing seemed especially wrong.

The inside needed some work. The buyer said that Carvana hadn't done a full cleaning job but only had vacuumed the seats and floors, but they didn't mind giving it a good clean.

The buyer also paid $150 to have a mechanic give the Tesla a general inspection. What the mechanic found was a lot harder to overlook than the scratches.

Mechanic Finds a Big Gash in Tesla's Battery

Embedded media follows. Please allow a moment for it to load.

150 point inspection is a joke
by
u/ildisco in
CarvanaComplaints

The mechanic found a large gash in what the buyer identified as the Tesla's battery pack. They shared a close-up photo showing the damage and questioned how Carvana could have missed something that big.

There was more bad news during the inspection. According to the buyer, the mechanic also found two completely torn control arms. The buyer said the Tesla reportedly had no accident or damage history. They even wondered whether Carvana had bothered putting the car on a lift to check underneath it.

In the Reddit post, they called Carvana's advertised 150-point inspection a joke. They were especially bothered by the damage to the battery, considering how important it is to an electric vehicle.

Carvana Says Its Cars Go Through Multiple Inspections

Carvana published an explanation of its inspection process on October 15. The company said its technicians check brakes, tires, electrical equipment and other mechanical parts before putting cars up for sale.

According to Carvana, technicians repair or replace anything that fails its inspection. The cars then get another look from a quality-control team to check whether the work was done correctly.

There are more checks before delivery, including tire pressure, fluid levels and the battery. Carvana said employees also inspect vehicles every 14 days while they're sitting in inventory waiting to be sold.

The buyer hasn't shared anything indicating that the company has addressed the battery damage or the two control arms.

Buyer Couldn't Find EV Battery Condition on Inspection List

One person in the Reddit comments asked whether Carvana's checklist included the physical condition of an electric vehicle's battery. The buyer looked for it but couldn't find anything specifically mentioning that.

Other people shared their experiences with Carvana, including someone who sold the company a 2017 Toyota Sienna. They said the minivan had a transmission that was grinding and clunking, but Carvana still paid them for a vehicle in excellent condition.

Another commenter had better luck buying from Carvana. They'd purchased three cars without any problems, although they still took each one to their own mechanic before keeping it.

Carvana gives buyers seven days to return a vehicle and includes a limited warranty for 100 days or 4,189 miles. The Tesla buyer hasn't said whether they plan to return the car or what they'll do about the damage. They did have something to say about the independent inspection, though.

"Best $150 I've ever spent," the buyer wrote.

Most car salespeople would probably be thrilled to have a customer who returns every few months to purchase another vehicle, but one North Carolina salesman has actually tried convincing his regular customer to stop. Unfortunately, his warnings haven't made much of a difference, and the customer's expensive habit has now created an unusual opportunity for someone else.

TikTok creator Henry (@henrysellss), who works at Genesis of Winston-Salem in North Carolina, recently shared a video about a customer who apparently enjoys replacing vehicles long before most owners would even consider trading them in. According to Henry, the customer returns to the dealership every four to six months, despite knowing that constantly trading vehicles can become an expensive habit.

"We have tried talking him out of doing that as it loses him a bit of money in the long run, but he has the money [and] he doesn't mind doing it," Henry explained. Apparently, the customer values getting into another vehicle more than avoiding depreciation, which is certainly one way to approach car ownership.

However, Henry believes the customer's willingness to take a financial hit could actually benefit another buyer looking for a nearly new luxury SUV. His latest trade-in is a 2026 Genesis GV70 3.5T Sport Prestige with just 2,188 miles, and the dealership is offering it for approximately $7,000 less than the price of a comparable brand-new model.

North Carolina Customer Trades in $70,000 Genesis After Just 2,188 Miles

Embedded TikTok video follows; please give it a moment to load completely.

@henrysellssGreat way to save money!♬ original sound - Henrysellss

In his TikTok video, Henry explained that the customer's most recent trade-in is essentially as close to a brand-new vehicle as someone can get without purchasing one directly from the manufacturer. The Genesis GV70 3.5T Sport Prestige originally costs around $70,000 new, making the opportunity to purchase a lightly used example at a discount particularly appealing.

"So it's essentially as brand new of a car as a pre-owned car can get," Henry said while showing off the luxury SUV. He also emphasized that the vehicle is fully loaded and retains substantial warranty coverage, making it an attractive alternative for shoppers who want luxury features without paying the full new-car price.

Of course, saving $7,000 sounds fantastic until someone remembers that dealerships regularly offer incentives and discounts on brand-new vehicles, potentially narrowing the difference between new and used prices. According to the information shared alongside the video, Kelley Blue Book estimates that average new-vehicle incentives are around 8%, meaning shoppers should compare actual offers before assuming a nearly new vehicle is automatically the better deal.

Viewers Question Whether the Nearly New Genesis Is Actually a Good Deal

Although Henry presented the customer's trade-in as an opportunity for another buyer, not everyone in the comments was convinced that the discount was particularly impressive. "Is it an amazing deal?" one viewer asked before questioning how much buyers could normally save on a brand-new version, prompting Henry to explain that typical discounts are approximately $3,000 to $4,000.

Another commenter defended the offer, writing, "Nine percent off is a heck of a deal on a used (not 'technically used') car." However, someone else was considerably more skeptical about the vehicle's brief ownership history, suggesting, "He must drive those cars hard. No thanks."

The disagreement raises an interesting question about whether buying a vehicle with extremely low mileage is always preferable to purchasing something brand-new, particularly when manufacturer incentives could make the price difference smaller than expected.

Either way, Henry's customer doesn't appear particularly concerned about losing money every few months, and anyone considering his latest trade-in should probably spend a little more time comparing prices than he does keeping his vehicles.

Most people would probably reconsider their living arrangements after their workspace flooded three times, but one New York content creator decided to take things a little further. Rather than risk rebuilding his studio in the same location, he purchased a 16-year-old Honda Element with more than 220,000 miles and plans to turn it into a fully functional video production studio.

Paul Antill, a video producer and content creator for Tom's Guide, explained that repeated flooding destroyed thousands of dollars' worth of furniture and equipment and brought his video projects to a standstill. After discovering what he described as a serious plumbing issue and black mold, Antill decided his next studio needed something his previous workspace lacked: wheels.

However, finding the right vehicle proved considerably more difficult than simply browsing Facebook Marketplace and picking the first reasonably priced SUV. Antill wanted something spacious enough for filming equipment, compact enough for New York City streets, and inexpensive enough to leave room in his budget for modifications.

His search eventually led him to a bright orange 2010 Honda Element EX advertised for $6,500 in Virginia, approximately 350 miles from home. Despite its intimidating mileage, the vehicle appeared to offer exactly what he needed, although purchasing it would come with a few surprises of its own.

New York Creator Buys 220,000-Mile Honda Element After Searching for Weeks

Embedded YouTube video follows; please give it a moment to load completely.

In an article published by Tom's Guide, Antill explained that he initially considered larger vehicles such as the Ford Transit and Mercedes Sprinter before deciding they would be impractical for New York City parking. The Honda Element caught his attention because of its removable rear seats, spacious interior, and compact exterior dimensions, making it an appealing candidate for a mobile studio.

Unfortunately, finding an affordable example without serious mechanical or structural problems was another matter, as Antill inspected approximately a dozen Elements before finding one that met his expectations. Several suffered from significant rust, while others had neglected interiors or mechanical issues that made them unsuitable for a project he hoped would eventually travel far beyond city limits.

After discovering the 2010 Element on Facebook Marketplace, Antill flew to Virginia and inspected the vehicle with his father before agreeing to purchase it for $6,500. The SUV had accumulated exactly 220,306 miles, but its clean underbody and documented service history convinced him to take the gamble, with the ambitious goal of eventually reaching 500,000 miles.

Honda Element's Check Engine Light Returns Before Owner Even Makes It Home

Unfortunately, the excitement of purchasing his future mobile studio didn't last particularly long before the Honda reminded Antill that he had bought a 16-year-old vehicle. Approximately 30 minutes into his seven-hour drive home, the check engine light illuminated because of an oxygen sensor problem he had originally noticed during the test drive.

According to Antill, the dealership had attempted to resolve the issue before the purchase, but the replacement sensor wasn't the correct original-equipment part, causing the warning to return. Although the shop offered to install the proper sensor if he returned, Antill wasn't particularly interested in making another lengthy trip to Virginia, especially since the vehicle otherwise made it home without further trouble.

Despite the mechanical hiccup, Antill has already removed the rear seats, experimented with storage solutions, and begun equipping the Honda with a portable power station and solar equipment to support his cameras, drones, and laptop. His ongoing project, titled Finding My Element, will document the transformation of his $6,500 purchase into an off-grid production studio, proving that sometimes the answer to a flooded workspace might just be an aging orange Honda.

A Volkswagen GTI owner says a $7,000 engine and transmission replacement turned into another expensive problem. The replacement engine reportedly suffered damage before the car was even picked up from the repair shop.

The owner described the situation in an October 12 Reddit post, explaining that a mechanic initially declared the 2017 GTI repaired and ready for collection. Two days later, the shop reportedly discovered a new problem.

According to the owner, an electrode from a reused spark plug broke off inside the third cylinder of the replacement engine, causing internal damage. The mechanic reportedly suggested the plug might have contained a microscopic crack that escaped visual inspection.

Now, the customer faces a dispute over warranty coverage and the remaining $3,400 repair balance, raising questions about who should pay when a component reused during an engine swap fails.

Engine Swap Trouble

Mechanic replaced my engine, and said it was ready for pickup. Two days later told me it’s broken again.
by
u/DeepMortgage5887 in
AskMechanics

In the original r/AskMechanics post, the owner explained that the replacement engine had about 49,700 miles, while the transmission had about 55,300 miles.

The $7,000 agreement included installing the used components, and the owner had already paid $3,600.

Before installation, the mechanic reportedly explained that the replacement engine carried a warranty. Both parties agreed they could reuse some existing components, but the owner specifically requested that the mechanic identify and replace questionable parts.

The owner said they supplied a new water pump and were prepared to purchase other components if needed. However, they maintain that the mechanic never discussed reusing the old spark plugs.

An unusual noise reportedly appeared while the completed vehicle remained at the shop, leading to the discovery of the damaged cylinder.

Who Pays?

The mechanic reportedly argued that the replacement engine's warranty covered the long block but excluded failures caused by transferred components.

As a compromise, the shop offered to replace the damaged cylinder head at its own expense if the owner paid the outstanding $3,400 balance.

However, the proposal came without assurances that additional engine problems would not develop.

The owner also shared the experience in a separate r/GolfGTI discussion, where several commenters criticized the decision to reuse spark plugs during an engine replacement.

One commenter identifying as an Audi technician argued that transferring spark plugs from a failed engine was unreasonable unless the customer had explicitly declined replacements.

Others noted that new spark plugs generally cost relatively little compared with a complete engine swap.

Seeking A Resolution

The owner said a family member with a legal background became involved and confirmed they had documentation of communications with the shop.

Commenters recommended reviewing the written warranty and repair agreement before authorizing more work or making another payment. The exact warranty language has not been independently verified.

The dispute highlights an important consideration for anyone buying a used replacement engine: the engine's warranty may not cover components transferred from the original motor.

Before approving a major repair, customers can request an itemized list identifying which components will be replaced, which will be reused, and whether failures involving transferred parts are covered.

As of the latest visible comments, the owner had not confirmed whether the shop completed the proposed cylinder-head repair or returned the GTI. The mechanic's explanation of the failure has not been independently verified.

A buyer shopping for a used Ram 2500 says a dealership abruptly canceled the transaction after agreeing to remove thousands of dollars in additional charges. According to the buyer, the dealership couldn't make money by financing the truck.

The buyer described the experience in a Reddit post on r/UsedCars, explaining that the dealership initially had no objection to financing arranged through a credit union. That changed after several hours of negotiations.

The vehicle was a used 2022 Ram 2500 priced at $53,298. According to the buyer, it had already sat on the dealership lot for about six months, making the decision to abandon a potential sale particularly surprising.

What began as a negotiation over the truck's price and trade-in value turned into a dispute over additional fees, questionable tax calculations, and the dealership's expectations for financing revenue.

Thousands in Fees

Dealer cancelled sale after agreeing on price because I wouldn’t use their financing. Am I missing something?
by
u/tankspikefayebebop in
UsedCars

The buyer arrived with credit union financing already approved and an existing vehicle to trade in. The dealership eventually agreed to offer $39,000 for the trade, which carried an outstanding loan balance of approximately $28,729.

However, the initial paperwork included a $2,999 dealer care package and a $1,200 documentation fee. The buyer also questioned the calculated taxes, claiming they appeared to be roughly twice the expected amount.

After further negotiations, the dealership agreed to eliminate the care package and reduce the documentation fee to $400. The dealership maintained that its tax calculations were correct.

Before signing anything, the buyer wanted to measure the garage at home to ensure the truck would fit. Both sides verbally agreed on the proposed transaction structure, subject to that final check.

Dealership Cancels Sale

After measuring the garage, the buyer contacted the salesperson to confirm financing and request the sales agreement. Instead of receiving the paperwork, the buyer received a phone call explaining that the dealership would no longer proceed.

According to the Reddit account, the salesperson attributed the decision to the manager, saying the dealership wasn't making enough money without arranging the financing itself.

That explanation frustrated the buyer, who said the salesperson knew about the credit union financing before negotiations began. The buyer also claimed the experience took about five hours and did not result in a vehicle purchase.

The buyer did not identify the dealership, and its explanation has not been verified beyond the buyer's account. The post described no signed purchase contract.

Financing and Profit

Dealership-arranged financing can generate additional revenue through lender compensation, interest-rate markups, or financing-related products. However, the amount a dealership earns varies by transaction and lender agreement.

The Federal Trade Commission recommends that consumers obtain preapproval for financing before visiting a dealership. Comparing outside financing with dealership offers helps buyers evaluate total cost rather than focusing only on monthly payments.

The FTC also advises consumers to request an out-the-door price in writing, including applicable fees, before visiting the dealership.

This is particularly relevant when additional products or charges appear during negotiations. An itemized price makes it easier to spot unexpected expenses and compare competing offers.

Whether a dealership can withdraw a proposed transaction depends on the circumstances, applicable state law, and whether the parties entered into an enforceable agreement. A verbal understanding does not automatically establish that a sale was completed.

Buyer Moves On

The Reddit discussion attracted responses from other consumers describing similar experiences with dealership financing.

Several commenters suggested accepting dealership financing and refinancing afterward through a credit union. However, buyers considering that approach should first review the loan agreement for prepayment provisions, potential fees, and any conditions that affect the negotiated price.

Others recommended finding a different dealership rather than continuing negotiations with a seller unwilling to accept outside financing.

The buyer ultimately indicated that the search for another truck would continue, although finding a used heavy-duty pickup in acceptable condition remained difficult.

The experience illustrates why buyers should negotiate the vehicle price, review fees, and confirm acceptable payment arrangements before finalizing a transaction.

Crashing any expensive car is painful enough, but damaging a Bugatti Chiron takes things to an entirely different level. One unfortunate driver in Miami discovered that as a blacked-out example of the French hypercar ended up stranded beside a road.

Footage shared on Instagram by Only in Dade shows the Chiron sitting awkwardly on a curb, with visible damage to several parts. The incident is said to have happened earlier this week on wet roads.

Exactly what caused the crash is not known, although the hypercar appears to have slid or spun before coming to rest near a large tree. Fortunately for the owner, the car seems to have stopped short of hitting it.

With just 500 Chirons produced worldwide, we don't often see a damaged one. Considering the car's multimillion-dollar value and complicated engineering, getting this example back into shape could be an expensive undertaking.

The Chiron Took A Serious Hit

 

 

 

 

 

 

View this post on Instagram

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A post shared by ONLY in DADE (@onlyindade)

The footage shows the Chiron's rear end resting on the curb, with its passenger-side rear wheel sitting at, well, let's just say a rather unnatural angle, suggesting potentially significant suspension damage. A proper inspection would be needed to establish the full extent.

The front bumper and splitter also appear cracked, while one of the front wheels may have sustained damage. Components underneath the car could have been affected as well, particularly given how it came to a stop.

We can't determine the total damage from the available footage, and no official repair estimate has been released. However, even relatively minor repairs to a Bugatti can become extraordinarily expensive.

Fixing A Bugatti Isn't Exactly Straightforward

The Chiron's sophisticated construction and specialized components make repairs much more complicated than those of an ordinary performance car. Sourcing replacement parts and finding technicians qualified to work on the hypercar can also present challenges.

Automotive YouTuber Mat Armstrong has demonstrated those difficulties while rebuilding a damaged Chiron Pur Sport. His project has shown how restrictive access to factory parts can complicate independent repairs. Funnily enough, Armstrong actually commented on the Instagram post with two words: "Cash waiting..." 

An Expensive Mistake, Whatever Happened

At the time of writing, there's no confirmed explanation for the crash or information about whether anyone was injured. We also don't know the owner's identity and the Chiron's eventual repair plans.

The car may ultimately be restored through Bugatti's authorized repair network, although that hasn't been confirmed. Whatever happens next, this is one parking spot its owner probably wishes they'd never found.

Remember MapQuest? The navigation service that helped millions of drivers find their way around long before Google Maps became the default choice is making headlines again, this time with a feature that could appeal to privacy-conscious motorists.

MapQuest has introduced a new Surveillance Layer that displays the reported locations of automated license plate readers and other outdoor surveillance cameras. That includes devices operated by Flock Safety, a company whose technology has attracted growing scrutiny over privacy concerns.

The feature allows drivers to see where known surveillance cameras are positioned along roads and in surrounding neighborhoods. While it won't stop cameras from recording passing vehicles, it could help motorists make more informed decisions about their routes.

Announcing the update on Bluesky, MapQuest used the tagline "The Roads Have Eyes!" The company also confirmed that the feature covers equipment from several surveillance technology providers, not just Flock.

MapQuest Doesn't Just Show Flock Cameras

The Roads Have Eyes! 👁️

Turn on the Surveillance Layer in Map Options to see known license plate readers from Flock Safety, Motorola Solutions (Vigilant), Genetec, Axis Communications, Axon, Leonardo (ELSAG), Neology, Rekor, PlateSmart, Ubicquia, Verkada, and other outdoor surveillance cameras.

[image or embed]

— MapQuest (@mapquest.com) October 16, 2026 at 12:49 AM

The new Surveillance Layer includes known license plate readers from Flock Safety, Motorola Solutions' Vigilant system, Genetec, Axis Communications, Axon, Leonardo's ELSAG, Neology, Rekor, PlateSmart, Ubicquia, and Verkada. Other outdoor surveillance cameras may also appear on the map.

The information comes from OpenStreetMap, a community-maintained mapping database. This means the locations depend on publicly contributed information rather than a comprehensive official database of surveillance equipment.

As a result, the feature shouldn't be treated as a guarantee that every camera in an area has been identified. An unmarked road could still have surveillance equipment operating nearby.

How To Enable The Surveillance Layer

Accessing the feature is straightforward, provided you're using the MapQuest mobile app. Open the map, select the Layers or Map Options icon, and enable the Surveillance option.

Known cameras will then appear as eye-shaped markers on the map, making them easier to identify while planning a journey. The layer sits alongside familiar mapping options such as traffic and incident information.

The feature doesn't automatically reroute drivers around cameras or make vehicles invisible to surveillance systems. Instead, it provides additional information that users can consider when choosing where to drive.

Why Flock Cameras Are So Controversial

Flock Safety's automated license plate readers capture information about passing vehicles, including license plate numbers, locations, and timestamps. Law enforcement agencies use the technology to investigate crimes, identify vehicles of interest, and assist in locating missing people.

However, critics have raised concerns about how extensively these systems track ordinary drivers and who can access the information they collect. Allegations of improper searches and misuse by law enforcement personnel have added to the controversy.

Supporters argue that license plate readers are valuable public-safety tools, while privacy advocates question whether the benefits justify collecting detailed records of vehicle movements. MapQuest's update arrives as that debate continues across the United States.

An Unexpected Comeback For MapQuest

Launched in 1996, MapQuest was once one of the biggest names in online navigation before Google Maps and other competitors overtook it. The service has continued operating and recently introduced additional features, including Android Auto support and public transit directions.

Its new surveillance feature gives drivers something they won't typically find in mainstream navigation apps. For anyone curious about the cameras watching their daily commute, MapQuest now offers an interesting way to find out.

A California woman left her Audi Q5 at a Santa Monica repair shop to have two minor leaks fixed. The following evening, the SUV crashed into a concrete barrier nine miles away, reportedly while the shop's manager was driving it after closing.

Alicia Good says she never gave anyone permission to take her Audi home. By the time she learned about the crash, the damaged vehicle had already been towed back to the business.

Good has shared photographs and videos of the wrecked SUV on social media, describing the collision and her efforts to get the shop to replace it.

Her Audi was 13 years old with approximately 68,000 miles. More than a month after the crash, she was still driving a rental car and waiting for an offer.

An Extra Night at the Shop

Embedded media follows; please allow a moment for it to load.

@alicia.goodPart 4: Storytime! The manager of my mechanic shop totaled my Audi Q5 after hours, 9 miles from mechanic shop.♬ original sound - Alicia Good

Good brought her Audi to A&E German Car Service on Thursday, September 3, after a dashboard warning indicated a fluid problem. She told the Palisadian-Post that she used ChatGPT to compare repair quotes before choosing the shop, which had favorable reviews and had been operating for decades. She expected the repairs to be straightforward.

When the business asked to keep the vehicle an additional night, she agreed.

According to Good's account, the shop's manager took the Audi after closing on Friday. Around 8:15 p.m., approximately two hours and 15 minutes after the business closed, the SUV struck concrete K-rail barriers along Palisades Drive in Pacific Palisades.

The Palisadian-Post also reported that emergency responders transported the driver to UCLA Health Santa Monica Medical Center. Good told the newspaper he was later released.

Photographs show the Audi's hood crumpled, the front bumper torn away, and mechanical components exposed. Good says the force of the collision split the engine.

Good said a crash expert who examined the damage estimated the Audi had been traveling between 90 and 100 mph, although that speed has not been independently established.

The Call That Came Saturday

Good says the shop owner knew about the crash by approximately 9:15 p.m. Friday but did not contact her that evening.

She began calling the business Saturday morning to ask when she could collect her Audi. Employees repeatedly told her someone would get back to her.

Around 2 p.m., the owner finally called and told her there had been a single-car accident involving a barricade.

Good described seeing the damage in an October 14 interview with FOX 11. Her hand was shaking, she recalled, as she looked at the crushed front end and the vehicle's distorted structure.

During that visit, she says the owner made a promise.

"Don't worry, we're going to get you the same car, but lower mileage," he told her, according to Good.

Her immediate reaction was "good luck." Her Audi was already 13 years old with just 68,000 miles.

Good said she subsequently heard four different explanations about what happened to her vehicle.

A Rental, but No Replacement

The shop arranged a rental car approximately a week after the collision, allowing Good to get around while the dispute continued.

"It's now been a month. I still don't have an offer," she told FOX 11 in October.

FOX 11 attempted to speak with the owner of A&E German Car Service, but he was unavailable. Employees declined to explain why the vehicle had been driven miles away from the business, saying the matter was being handled by the shop's insurance company.

Good also contacted police about the incident. She told FOX 11 that officers questioned whether the circumstances constituted grand theft because she had originally entrusted the Audi to the repair shop.

California Vehicle Code Section 10851 prohibits taking or driving a vehicle without its owner's consent under circumstances covered by the statute. Good maintains that permission to perform repairs did not include taking her SUV home.

A Warning for Other Drivers

Good has since encouraged vehicle owners to photograph their odometers and document their cars' condition before leaving them for service.

She also recommends putting a tracker on the keys and another inside the vehicle, with notifications when the car leaves the repair shop.